Tea Party 4-18-11 Topic

Recklessness not negligence.  For negligence to occur, the mortgage companies would have had to have no inkling that the sub-prime mortgages would fail.  I find that very hard to believe.

10/13/2010 11:12 PM

WASHINGTON – A joint investigation by every state and the District of Columbia could force mortgage companies to settle allegations that they used flawed documents to foreclose on hundreds of thousands of homeowners.

It could take months, at least, for any settlement to be reached. But legal experts say lenders could be forced to accept an independent monitor to ensure they follow state foreclosure laws. The banks could also be subject to financial penalties and be forced to pay some people whose foreclosures were improperly handled.

For banks, "the most efficient way for them to get out from under this is to settle across the board," said Kathleen Engel, a law professor at Suffolk University in Boston.

Employees of several major lenders have acknowledged in depositions that they signed thousands of foreclosure documents without reading them as required by state laws.

"This is not simply about a glitch in paperwork," Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who's leading the probe announced Wednesday, said in a statement. "It's also about some companies violating the law and many people losing their homes."

At a news conference, Miller said the states might be open to alternatives to financial penalties for the banks. They might, for example, agree instead to have lenders step up their efforts to help people reduce their loan payments so they can avoid foreclosure.

The document problems could prolong the housing downturn if many home buyers become unwilling to purchase foreclosed homes. But for a few months anyway, the problems could help prop up prices, because fewer low-priced foreclosed homes will be for sale.

Analysts don't expect many people who lost homes to foreclosure to recover them.

The industry has begun to respond to pressure from state and federal officials. JPMorgan Chase & Co. said Wednesday it would extend its review of its foreclosure cases to 41 states — doubling the number of its cases under review to 115,000. JPMorgan had previously said it was halting foreclosures in the 23 states where foreclosures must be approved by a judge.

This week, GMAC Mortgage, a unit of Ally Financial Inc., said it had hired legal and accounting firms to review its foreclosure procedures in all 50 states. GMAC has halted some foreclosures in 23 states. Bank of America has done so in all 50.

And Wells Fargo & Co. has said it would review pending foreclosures for potential defects. Wells says it's discovered no problems.

Ask America: Learn. Listen. Be heard.

In their announcement Wednesday, the state officials said they would review evidence that documents were signed by mortgage company employees who didn't verify the information in them. They also said many documents appeared to have been signed without a notary public witnessing that signature — a violation of state law.

Attorneys general have taken the lead in responding to the revelations. State officials, not the federal government, enforce foreclosure laws, which vary by state.

Not all attorneys general have identical powers to investigate. Without clear evidence of a crime, they usually file lawsuits to force businesses to stop actions or to pay damages to wronged consumers.

The filing of false documents in court can be prosecuted as perjury. Any lawyers involved in improper foreclosures could suffer sanctions or lose their law licenses for unethical activity.

As part of their probe, state officials will be able to issue subpoenas to extract potentially incriminating documents from the industry. Such evidence could be used in lawsuits or to force settlements with lenders.

A key question is whether state investigators can persuade bank employees to divulge some of the industry's secrets, said Ray Brescia, an Albany Law School professor who has tracked the mortgage crisis. Some mortgage company workers could have a powerful incentive to do so rather than face criminal charges, he noted.

"It's quite possible that there will be insiders who come forward to reveal the inner workings of these "boiler room" foreclosure mills, which likely won't be good for the banks," Brescia said.

A lawsuit that Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray filed this month against GMAC Mortgage and Ally Financial could preview things to come around the country.

Cordray's lawsuit seeks to halt potentially illegal foreclosure practices. It also asks that a judge stop sales of any foreclosed homes involving paperwork filed by a GMAC employee who signed hundreds of faulty documents. And it aims to toss out foreclosure judgments on homes that haven't yet sold.

The Ohio lawsuit also seeks damages for consumers and civil penalties of $25,000 for each separate violation. If similar cases were brought in all 50 states, it could total billions of dollars in damages and fines for lenders and others involved in foreclosures.

The allegations raise the possibility that foreclosure proceedings nationwide could be subject to legal challenge. More than 2.5 million homes have been lost to foreclosure since the recession started in December 2007, according to RealtyTrac Inc.

Kendall Coffey, a former U.S. attorney in Miami, said that fixing faulty or fraudulent mortgage paperwork can be relatively easy if a case is ongoing. But it's far more complex if a foreclosure has been completed and the home already sold.

There also are limits to what officials in some states can do.

For example, in Florida, an epicenter for foreclosure cases, Attorney General Bill McCollum suffered a setback last week in a probe into practices by four law firms that handled foreclosures. A judge ruled that McCollum had no authority to subpoena records from one firm. It said the state's bar association was the proper forum to decide whether to sanction the firm.

A different Florida firm involved in that investigation, the Law Offices of David J. Stern, is seeking a similar ruling. Government-controlled mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have stopped referring foreclosures to Stern's firm while they review the firm's filings.

Also Wednesday, federal regulators said all mortgage companies that work with Fannie and Freddie will have to review foreclosure documents and refile them if they spot problems. That will affect most of the industry, because Fannie and Freddie own or guarantee about half the nation's home loans.

In cases where no problems turn up, foreclosures "should proceed without delay," the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the agency that regulates Fannie and Freddie, said.

10/13/2010 11:33 PM
Posted by jiml60 on 10/13/2010 11:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 10/13/2010 8:34:00 PM (view original):
Negligence is bad. Fraud is a crime. The two are very different.
In your overzealousness to protect your precious corporate masters, you come off looking like an idiot...again.

Here's a little reading for you, explaining the fraud that is being committed. www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/10/why-foreclosure-fraud-is-so-dangerous-to-property-rights/

Of course it's easy for you tea-baggers to blame the borrowers for the mess we're in instead of laying blame where it ought to be - the banking industry and deregulation.
The blames on all 3 - the fed, the banks, and yes... the borrower.
10/14/2010 12:07 AM
Posted by jiml60 on 10/13/2010 11:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by swamphawk22 on 10/13/2010 8:34:00 PM (view original):
Negligence is bad. Fraud is a crime. The two are very different.
In your overzealousness to protect your precious corporate masters, you come off looking like an idiot...again.

Here's a little reading for you, explaining the fraud that is being committed. www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/10/why-foreclosure-fraud-is-so-dangerous-to-property-rights/

Of course it's easy for you tea-baggers to blame the borrowers for the mess we're in instead of laying blame where it ought to be - the banking industry and deregulation.
That story is about forclosures, well after the original loans we are talking about.

Try to pay attention.
10/14/2010 12:31 AM
Posted by The Taint on 10/13/2010 11:12:00 PM (view original):

Recklessness not negligence.  For negligence to occur, the mortgage companies would have had to have no inkling that the sub-prime mortgages would fail.  I find that very hard to believe.

By the end of the that whole sad, sorry cycle, the point of a mortgage was to use it to create a mortgage-backed security, not to actually make money off the mortgage.

So it wasn't that they knew the mortgage would fail... it's that whether it failed or not wasn't even part of the equation on their end. If you want to split that hair on the side of recklessness and not negligence, go ahead, but I think it falls well within the latter.
10/14/2010 11:23 PM
You may think so but a court of law probably wouldn't.
10/15/2010 2:24 PM
Dictionary definitions are pretty useless on legal matters, but the basic legal definition of negligence is:

Conduct that falls below the standards of behavior established by law for the protection of others against unreasonable risk of harm. A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances.

You don't think offering a mortgage without bothering to check whether the person you're offering it to can possibly pay it off falls under 'departing from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances'?
10/15/2010 4:51 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
I don't believe there is a law that sets requirements on lenders regarding who they can/cannot give home loans to. Do I think it's stupid that they don't check, yes. Do I think it's criminal negligence, possibly but it goes much further than that and should be prosecuted as such.

In a court of law recklessness transcends negligence and that was really my point.

10/15/2010 6:22 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.

Isnt there another way to look at this.

This was soemone's idea to make money.

This was not a crime, this was not people not caring what happened.

Someone invented a new way to make money. They started reselling loans.

Why does everything that Business does in America have to be spun as evil by the left?

10/16/2010 1:57 AM

NEW YORK (AFP) – The former financial CEO of failed mortgage giant Countrywide Financial agreed to pay tens of millions of dollars to settle fraud charges that fueled the 2008 subprime crisis, regulators said on Friday.

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that Angelo Mozilo will pay a 22.5 million dollars penalty and repay 45 million dollars in company profits, in what was the largest-ever financial penalty paid to the SEC by a top executive.

Two other top Countrywide executives, David Sambol and Eric Sieracki, also agreed to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to settle the charges.

The SEC alleged that the three failed to disclose to investors the significant credit risk that Countrywide was taking. In addition, Mozilo was charged with selling company shares based on inside knowledge of the company's troubles.

"Mozilo's record penalty is the fitting outcome for a corporate executive who deliberately disregarded his duties to investors by concealing what he saw from inside the executive suite -- a looming disaster in which Countrywide was buckling under the weight of increasing risky mortgage underwriting," said Robert Khuzami, head of the SEC's enforcement division.

Bank of America in 2008 purchased Countrywide, the largest US mortgage lender that had been at the center of the country's subprime loan crisis.

The bank agreed to pay four billion dollars in shares for Countrywide in a deal that rescued the nation's largest mortgage lender from a collapse that could have sent shock waves through the world's biggest economy.

 

10/16/2010 11:59 AM

Subprime Loans and More
It's a Bull Market for Financial Fraud

01/31/08

 

Imagine landing your dream home.Your credit is a bit shaky, but you manage to get a subprime loan with an adjustable rate mortgage. A few years later the interest rates jump and you can no longer afford to pay. You see an ad for a business that’s willing to help—it’ll pay your mortgage for a modest monthly fee while you get back on your feet. But here’s the heartbreak: it’s a scam. The con artists just take your money and run…

It’s just one of the latest schemes and frauds we’re seeing these days across the financial services industry, our senior criminal investigators said during a briefing Tuesday with the news media in Washington.

These scams—which include plenty of shenanigans with mortgages and subprime loans—are costing the nation tens of billions of dollars a year.

“Greed is definitely not good for our economy right now,” said our top criminal investigative exec Ken Kaiser following the briefing. “It’s hurting homeowners. It’s hurting honest businesses. And it’s hurting investors and markets around the world.”

All good reasons why we’re squarely focused on cracking down on the largest of these financial crimes, launching proactive initiatives and shifting resources as trends emerge, all the while working hand-in-hand with a host of government and private sector partners.

Among the specifics discussed at the briefing:

Subprime mortgage loans:

  • We're investigating 14 corporations involved in subprime lending as part of our Subprime Mortgage Industry Fraud Initiative launched last year.
  • The companies come from across the financial services industry, from mortgage lenders to investment banks that bundle loans into securities sold to investors. We’re also looking at insider trading by some executives.


Traditional mortgage fraud:

  • We have more than 1,200 cases open today (up about 40 percent from last year), mostly involving fraud for profit, where groups of straw buyers, realtors, etc. rig schemes to buy properties that are flipped or allowed to go into foreclosure.
  • Hotspots include California, Texas, Arizona, Florida, Ohio, Michigan, and Utah.
  • Suspicious activity reports that we review for potential mortgage fraud have grown from 3,000 in fiscal year 2003 to 48,000 in fiscal year 2007. This year, we’re on pace to receive more than 60,000 such reports.
  • A recent case: In November, the owners of a long-time Minnesota homebuilder called Parish Marketing—along with a bank officer, a closing agent, and others—pled guilty to a $100 million mortgage scheme involving some 200 homes.
  • Right now, we’re seeing no links to organized crime syndicates, street gangs, or terrorist groups in our cases.
10/16/2010 11:59 AM

70 Indictments Comming Down in Chicagoland Mortgage Fraud

Mortgage fraud crackdown looms

Up to 70 people may be charged with fraud here

By Jeff Coen and Todd Lighty

Tribune reporters

11:08 PM CDT, June 18, 2008

 

Federal authorities fanned out Wednesday and began making arrests in what sources called a sweeping investigation of mortgage fraud in the Chicago area and across the country.

Up to 70 people were expected to be charged here as part of the effort, sources said. A first indictment publicly surfaced this week.

The operation comes amid an unfolding mortgage crisis nationwide that has led federal authorities to make mortgage fraud a new priority.

Announcements of charges were expected as soon as Thursday in Washington D.C., Chicago and elsewhere.

As mortgage fraud has boomed, it has become more sophisticated, authorities have said, and investigators have begun targeting prolific crews, some with links to street gangs. Those arrested this week in the latest case include brokers and appraisers, sources said.

The investigation is the first major case of its kind in Chicago since federal authorities brought charges in February in a mortgage fraud scheme that grew out of a probe of the Black Disciples and Black P Stone gangs, authorities said.

In that case, drug money was being laundered through the purchase and renovation of real estate, authorities said. Investigators with the FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service eventually found some 100 properties tied up in the scheme, officials said.

In the new case, court records showed, a federal grand jury on Tuesday indicted Jonathan Hon, who bought and sold real estate in Chicago and the suburbs. Hon controlled Lucid Muse Corp. and Lucid Muse Properties Inc., according to the indictment.

Hon allegedly used straw purchasers in the scheme to defraud lenders, title companies and financial institutions, according to the court records.

Hon submitted paperwork for loans for the straw buyers knowing they wouldn't make payments, the charges alleged. Hon then kept control over the properties, including many on the South Side, and used some of the money he brought in to pay off lien holders, the charges alleged.

The false applications allegedly informed lenders that the straw buyers would be residing in the homes when Hon knew that not to be true.

In all, authorities allege that a mortgage broker pocketed about $2.5 million as part of the lending scam involving seven homes in Oak Park, River Forest and Chicago.

Hon, 37, was indicted on five counts of wire fraud and on another six counts of mail fraud. He is accused of falsely obtaining federal low-income housing assistance on rental property he did not own.

Hon, who was a principal in Burnham Mortgage Inc., could not be reached Wednesday for comment. Lucid Muse Corp. and Lucid Muse Properties have dissolved, according to the Secretary of State's Web site.

"Jonathan has always been a hard-working member of the business community," said Hon's lawyer, Michael Petro. "We are going to examine these charges and respond accordingly in court."

Petro added that the conduct Hon is charged with involves transactions from several years ago.

"The mortgage companies approved these applications, the title companies approved them and the banks approved them," Petro said. "Now, five years later, the U.S. attorney says there's something criminal."

Hon is scheduled to be arraigned next week. He has been released on his own recognizance, court records show.

Two other cases related to mortgage fraud were filed late Wednesday. They involve the owner of a mortgage company, the owner of a brokerage and a builder who owned property through two companies.

Charged with mail fraud in one of the cases were Jeff Trochowski, the owner of Lakeshore Financial Corp., and Greg Sarwa, who owned properties through PGN Inc. and Kee Builders.

The men allegedly obtained fraudulent loans by inflating the value of properties, with Sarwa bringing in more than $750,000.

In another case, Anthony Matthews, the owner of Express Mortgage, was charged with one count of fraud for allegedly scheming with others to obtain more than $1 million in loans on five South Side properties.

Matthews, according to court records, prepared mortgage loan applications that inflated unqualified buyers' income and personal savings in order to persuade the banks to approve the loans. Records show that Matthews was assisted by an unidentified accomplice who created false W-2 wage forms, bank statements and pay stubs. The lenders suffered about $400,000 in losses on the bad loans from 2003 through 2006, authorities said.

Attorneys for them could not be reached for comment.

Announcement of the national federal effort will come just days after the FBI made it known that leaders of its offices in cities hit hard by mortgage fraud were being directed to make it a priority over other types of financial crime.

The bureau reported that during the 12 months ending last September, calls from lenders about suspicious activity involving mortgages had surged about 30 percent over the same period a year earlier.

The FBI pointed to Illinois, Florida, Georgia, California, Nevada, Arizona, Texas, New York, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana and Minnesota as hot spots.

 

10/16/2010 12:01 PM

WASHINGTON — Federal regulators on Monday accused three former top executives of collapsed mortgage lender New Century Financial Corp. of fraud, saying they misled investors and inflated profits as the company's subprime loan business was failing in 2006.

In a case stemming from the mortgage market meltdown, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a lawsuit seeking injunctions, and unspecified civil fines and restitution against New Century's former CEO and co-founder Brad Morrice, former chief financial officer Patti Dodge and former controller David Kenneally.

The SEC also wants the three barred from serving as officers or directors of any public company and reimbursement of their bonuses or stock option awards.

Irvine, Calif.-based New Century had been the No. 2 U.S. maker of subprime mortgage loans, extended to borrowers with inferior credit records and the spark that ignited the home-loan bust. The company filed for bankruptcy protection in April 2007 after disclosing accounting errors. It was dissolved in August 2008.

Lawyers for Morrice and Dodge said they intend to contest the agency's charges.

"We believe the evidence will show that Ms. Dodge fully and completely fulfilled all her fiduciary and corporate obligations to New Century and its shareholders," Dodge's attorney, Terry Bird, said in a statement. "She looks forward to responding to these allegations and clearing her good name."

The allegations against Morrice "are flatly false and will be proved false at trial," said Josh Epstein, a spokesman for the Proskauer Rose law firm, which is representing Morrice. "Brad did all he could to save the company and to accurately report the company's numerous challenges to its shareholders. While his efforts failed, there was no fraud."

Kenneally's attorney didn't respond to calls seeking comment Monday.

Once a Wall Street darling, New Century had a market value of more than $1 billion at its zenith. It collapsed after a spike in defaults on subprime mortgages prompted its lenders to pull funding and demand that it buy back bad loans.

Story continues below
 
 
Advertisement

About 70 percent of the loans made by New Century featured low initial "teaser" interest rates designed to increase after a period of time.

In its suit filed in federal court in Los Angeles, the SEC alleged that New Century's disclosures to investors falsely sought to assure them that its business wasn't at risk and was performing better than competitors – omitting significant negative information such as a dramatic increase in defaults on home loans. The three executives were aware of the negative information from numerous internal reports they received, including weekly reports that Morrice dubbed "Storm Watch," according to the SEC.

The SEC said the executives' misconduct inflicted major losses on New Century investors. Its stock traded at $30 to $50 from early 2006 through early 2007, but after the restatement of accounts was announced in February 2007, the shares plunged to around $19, the agency said. The stock was below $1 a share at the time of the bankruptcy filing two months later.

"New Century shareholders took a double hit," SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami said in a statement. "The company's mortgage assets and business performance became increasingly impaired, and management manipulated its numbers and concealed its deteriorating performance."

In a March 2008 report, a court examiner in California found that New Century used improper accounting practices while making risky loans, creating "a ticking time bomb" that led to its rapid demise.

The examiner's report found that 40 percent of the company's loans were so-called stated-income loans that don't require borrowers to verify their income. The company's predominant criteria for making loans was whether it could resell them on the secondary market, New Century directors and senior managers told investigators.

The SEC said it is "devoting significant resources to identifying and holding accountable those who committed fraud in the subprime industry."

In June, the agency brought civil fraud charges against Countrywide Financial Corp. CEO Angelo Mozilo and two other former executives of what had been the biggest U.S. mortgage lender. Mozilo, the most high-profile individual to face charges from the government in the aftermath of the financial crisis, has denied any wrongdoing.

The former head of American Home Mortgage Investment Corp., Michael Strauss, agreed in April to pay nearly $2.5 million to settle SEC charges of accounting fraud and concealing the company's deteriorating finances as the mortgage crisis hit in 2007.

The SEC has said it is investigating about two dozen cases related to possible mortgage fraud, in addition to its efforts with the Justice Department and other federal agencies.


 
10/16/2010 12:02 PM
◂ Prev 1...79|80|81|82|83...133 Next ▸
Tea Party 4-18-11 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.