52 M Draft Rosters & Commentary Topic

IMO owners that play PFs at the SF position make a mistake in that the majority  of those players are inside mostly and make it much easier to defend. Offensive spacing is something that isn't talked about because there are no hard numbers to go by, but I really believe that playing 3 players on offense that all are mostly mid range and inside hurts a team offensively. I mean how many times in this league have we seen the Dennis Rodman at SF and Spencer Haywood at at PF fail terribly? I've never seen a team win this league with a player like Rodman or Horace Grant at SF.

When I first started playing in the ODL, I brought up the by-zone scoring.  I loathe mid-range players... I want a paint scorer + threes.  If you draft enough of the latter in the back court, then you can get a board hoarder at the 3.  It's actually harder to draft enough paint to counter balance the threes.  It really is.   If I can't get Barkley, I like getting a partial season player board-hoarder to start at the 3 (edge) and a bomber to come off the bench.  It works really nicely, actually.
9/14/2011 4:00 AM
Posted by ashamael on 9/14/2011 4:06:00 AM (view original):
Well, my backup for Bullwinkle was Bynum, so I have to change that.  Other than that, not much to do having just got home after a 7+ hour drive home.  Team will be entered shortly.

re:  Majerle... I wanted some offensive boards, threes, 5th tier or lower usage, low tov%, low fouls & 60+ defense.  There were guys that fit most of that, but Thunder was my top choice.  I also had the option with him of using a lower-minute version if I wanted to draft someone different in round 6 and have a nice platoon there, but I think I'll stick with the 92-93 minute version's 80 defense.

re:  usage... I have a tier 1 & a tier 3 in my SL.  Also a tier 4 with two tier 5s.  That's 16 usage points.  Just how many do you think is enough?

I'm not questioning your usage, because you understand it way better than I do. I focus more on total usage than the usage points thing, which I don't really understand. Was just saying that I personally would have a little more than that, but knowing full well that you understand the concept of usage better than I do.
9/14/2011 8:02 AM
ah.

Well, 16 + 32 + 17 + 17 + 23 = 105 + change (probably 2 or 3 more points from the decimals)
9/14/2011 4:09 PM
◂ Prev 1...7|8|9
52 M Draft Rosters & Commentary Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.