The reason we know there was nothing wrong with the actual words she used is that no one can even articulate what it was that was so wrong?

Was she incorrect? No.
Was she insensitive? No.

Oh if you chop it up and edit the video it makes it sound like she said something bad? Not her ******* problem. People need to grow brains and stop falling for propaganda.

bad luck is triggered. This is very entertaining.

How do you defend this?

https://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/1116390602546003973/video/1

i dont see it black and white..all or nothing.
i have said 100 times she said nothing wrong.
but just like trump she has a stern obligation not to speak in a way that could be inflammatory..unless she is a moron she should have known that comment would be chopped up and that is not a good way to handle a sensitive topic.
i have to disrespect her for that.
she blew a big opportunity...maybe on purpose.

If Dan Crenshaw loved the 9/11 vets so much, why doesn't he support legislation that would help them, and why did he insult one of them? That's far worse than anything Tlaib has done.

Posted by tangplay on 4/18/2019 1:59:00 PM (view original):
If Dan Crenshaw loved the 9/11 vets so much, why doesn't he support legislation that would help them, and why did he insult one of them? That's far worse than anything Tlaib has done.

Not what happened. But keep telling yourself that. LOL. Learn the details.

And your last sentence is subjective. You should be more like Lauren Chen and less like...well you.

Posted by cccp1014 on 4/18/2019 2:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 4/18/2019 1:59:00 PM (view original):
If Dan Crenshaw loved the 9/11 vets so much, why doesn't he support legislation that would help them, and why did he insult one of them? That's far worse than anything Tlaib has done.

Not what happened. But keep telling yourself that. LOL. Learn the details.

And your last sentence is subjective. You should be more like Lauren Chen and less like...well you.

He refused to cosponsor a bill to help 9/11 first responders. Tlaib has. He accused a 9/11 firefighter of conspiring with democrats.

Also, who tf is Lauren Chen?

Posted by dino27 on 4/18/2019 1:55:00 PM (view original):
i dont see it black and white..all or nothing.
i have said 100 times she said nothing wrong.
but just like trump she has a stern obligation not to speak in a way that could be inflammatory..unless she is a moron she should have known that comment would be chopped up and that is not a good way to handle a sensitive topic.
i have to disrespect her for that.
she blew a big opportunity...maybe on purpose.

What she said wasn’t inflammatory. At all.

ok...it would have been different if she said some people did something horrible...instead of something wrong.
can you not see the difference...words are her trade..she chose the words.
minimizing in your language something horrible is inflammatory.

It would have been different if she were white. Other than the color of her skin, her religion, and her clothes, nothing she said was bad/wrong/inflammatory.

She didn't minimize anything.

we will disagree on this.

Posted by cccp1014 on 4/18/2019 12:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/18/2019 12:02:00 PM (view original):
if I said that to your daughter you'd want to kick my ***(note I said want to...you couldn't). When Trump says it, its just locker room talk. Right. Hypocrite.

He never mentioned anyone by name and was talking to a guy. False equivalency. Try again. You're such a snowflake. No wonder you vote Blue. Suits you.

as usual, you don't address the issue. if someone said that about your daughter, would you or would you not want to kick his ***? I don't see how who tru mp said it to makes any difference. It is disrespectful to women to talk about them that way.
You're such a hypocritical *******.

but trump is not selective.....he talks the same about his wives and daughters.
and kelly ann conway and sarah huckabee sanders.
and dogs in heat.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/18/2019 1:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/17/2019 12:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/17/2019 1:03:00 AM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/16/2019 6:24:00 PM (view original):
probably true. But if all someone saw is that she said "somebody did something" without hearing anything else, it can come across as her marginalizing 9/11 whether someone is her opponent or not. As an elected representative I think she has an obligation to be clearer in the words she chooses to express herself. I feel the same way about any elected official regardless of whether I agree with them or not. It is one of my biggest issues with Mr Trump. In my view he does not express himself very well. I still would not agree with the vast majority of what he says, but if he at least expressed himself with dignity and clarity, it would not bother me as much. If you feel different about what Omar said, that is your opinion, and you are entitled to feel that way, just as I am entitled to feel the way I feel.

So if anyone one saw the edited 20 second clip of a 20 minute speech....ffs.

First of all, how many Americans do you think actually watched the whole 20 minute speech? I'd be willing to bet a minority of them. Most of them probably saw the 20 second clip. What I have been saying (and I don't think I will say it again after this) is that Omar is an public person and she should choose her words more carefully, regardless of what she meant when she said them. That is all I have been saying. She should choose her words with a little more care.

There wasn’t anything wrong with the words she chose.

we can just agree to disagree. there may not be anything wrong with the words she chose, but she could have chosen them better . Once again, that is all I am saying. I'm also done talking about it. Its not worth the time we have already spent arguing about it.