Posted by kmasonbx on 8/20/2010 5:42:00 PM (view original):
Yea that is ridiculous. It seems the job process works ok at the lower levels, but at D1 it's just awful. I just finished my 4th season at WVU after spending 5 seasons at Hampton and even with an A- loyalty and 6 NT appearances in 9 seasons including one Final 4 and one Elite 8 D- prestige schools don't want me because "I haven't been loyal enough." I mean really? If a coach with that kind of resume decided he didn't want to coach at a BCS school for whatever reason and wanted to go to a small school that school would jump on the chance.
Another thing is when I left Hampton I was coming off a Final 4 appearance and had a B prestige in a C- prestige conference, I took over WVU who had a B prestige in a B+ conference and my loyalty went from A+ to D-, I don't see how that makes sense either.
That is just ridiculous - I just took a hit from A+ to A- when I moved from Marquette to UCLA last season. The UCLA did have the prestige edge, but it was still listed as a Step Backward.
I also think it is insane that loyalty only matters for the low DI schools. Every big conference school - including the available A+ schools - are listed as 'Step Backwards' for me, as are some of the bigger mid-major conf teams, but I am flat out not qualified for every low DI opening. So A+ Syracuse, after losing their coach of 37 seasons, is willing to take a coach with loyalty concerns, but D- Middle Tennessee State with 6 wins in their last 2 seasons would refuse to talk to a coach with 2 DI NTs and 3 DI NCOY awards? That just seems backwards - the elite schools are the ones who are going to want stability from their coaches, low end teams should be happy to recognize that they are stepping stones and be happy to get the best coach they can for 3-4 seasons.