Posted by rednu on 2/18/2011 1:51:00 PM (view original):
I think its like any other category and the law of diminishing returns applies once you get up into the 20s and higher.
Once a player is ineligible though, I don't think he can improve in any other areas, so there's no "down" side to throwing all those minutes into study hall.
Personally, I've never gone higher than 20 minutes in study hall with a kid and only had one really that I questioned if he'd make the 2.0 after his midterm returned a juicy 1.4 GPA (and since he was a soph playing spot minutes, I really wasn't concerned if he flunked out of Rocks for Jocks...). The increase from 10 to 20 was enough to slide him in with a 2.0 at finals .
That's a good point about him not improving while he's ineligible. I wasn't aware of that.
This guy of mine was recruited as a project at PG, and not really getting many minutes just now - probably wouldn't for a couple of seasons, until my big junior class graduates. So it didn't set me back any, but I learned from this that some kids just aren't going to do well in school no matter what.
I've been using this formula for study hall that I found on some post on this board. Up until now, it's worked great. This is the first time I've had a problem with eligibility:
* Freshman: 4.0 - HS GPA x 10
* Sophomore: 3.6 - GPA x 10
* Junior: 3.2 - GPA x 10
* Senior: 2.8 - GPA x 10