Help!!!

Here is my Fort Valley St team, I know that I am young, and my iq's are not the best, but I feel like I should be better than 3-10. I have tried several different things but it does not seem to make any difference.

Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
2/5/2012 10:56 AM
Just glancing through, it appears you're getting murdered on the boards and your schedule is brutal. Nothing you can really do about that.
2/5/2012 11:01 AM
A brutal schedule is helpful as long as you still win your fair share of the games.  

Your main rotation looks like it has decent enough ATH/SPD to defend well.  Of your top 5 scorers, though, one is shooting .406 and another .367.  If I were coaching, I'd lower the distro on those two for a couple of games and see how they do.

Other than that, you might just be in the crack between good seasons, but you have the makings of a solid squad before long.  Don't do like me and get frustrated too easily.  It'll get better.





2/5/2012 12:25 PM
You've got yourself a big rebounding problem.  I would suggest starting Ferraro at 5 and Lepe at 4.  Etienne can back them both up and get enough minutes to keep improving that way.   Etienne should be very effective against backups.  Also, the lack of a strong LP presence is marginally more of an issue in the triangle.  However, the best you can do right now is to feed your 3 headed post monster equally and greenlight Scudder behind the arc (believe it or not, Freeman should be jacking up more).  If Scudder starts jacking them up, his % will have to go up -- he just can't be a 29% shooter -- he's not that bad.
2/5/2012 4:36 PM
Already made the switch to put Ferraro in the starting lineup. Thought his Reb and IQ would have to help.

Freeman is already at a +2, but maybe I should look at increasing his distro. Interesting thought about Scudder.
2/5/2012 10:40 PM

there are way better coaches out there than me, but I'm pulling for you since we played in NC.

Looking at your most recent loss, you went +2 against a team that has low PE ratings, and better LP ratings, plus you're a 2-3 zone which hurts REB and they had some solid rebounders (looking at a glance, not in depth...) - I'd have started the game against them at 0 with an adjustment set at losing or tied so the SIM could've gone to -1 or even -2 if they were winning inside. And if on the off-chance they were hitting from the outside, the SIM could've went to a + defense which should've solved that quickly with their ratings.

Looking at other message board posts in my year playing HD, it seems like adjustments like this have a small impact on the game overall, but I have to think a 4-point swing in your favor would be a conservative estimate on this game.

In that particular game, your team was just flat-out better, too. I'd have gone up-tempo or at the very least normal. Slow down just maximizes the chances for an upset with smaller sample of possessions.

2/6/2012 12:32 AM
and yes, I'd let Scudder shoot more three's for sure. 17 at this point is very low
2/6/2012 12:37 AM
at first glance i would say you need to recruit guards that have more rebounding ability than what you currently have. And you need players with higher def ratings. currently you only have 2 players with ratings in the 70's.
2/6/2012 2:17 AM
I don't think you need to play Freeman (or anyone else) at +2.   I think both Freeman and Scudder could be +1, with Freeman getting massive distro, followed by Scudder and your 3 post players, then scraps for everyone else.  Think of me as the kid in the stands with the hand painted "Free Scudder to Scud" t-shirt.
2/6/2012 12:41 PM

Lately I've found success with my zone team by running a 3-2 and putting my best rebounder in at the 5, and my second best rebounder in at the 4. I almost always out rebound my opponents and also don't give up that many 3's at all while running -2 or -3.

 

2/6/2012 1:05 PM
you are right, your team should probably be doing better. a couple things
- you have a young team, you need to exploit your elder quality players to the max
- freeman should be racking up around 25 ppg. scudder should be close to 15. this is triangle offense. there is very little stopping you from getting 40ppg out of those 2 players at high efficiency. your low end distro is less important at that point - but you do need to tweak that too. keep in mind the IQ gap is not what it was at the beginning of the season (not really saying play your freshman harder, well maybe 1 of them should be more like 4ppg now).
- i can't tell but it looks like you might have been messing with fatigue this season. in your last game, it looks like you have everyone on fairly fresh. you are running zone with few stars - those stars should be getting tired for sure (all your starters but your sf)
- if lepe is going to be scoring more than ferraro (makes sense), move him to C
- swap hoeft and roche. roche can pass, which hoeft can not do. also i see roche as a 4ppg type scorer on this team, hes the freshman id bump somewhat. he will do better at the 2 than 3 in that role, with his spd/per.
- your offense on this team really should have the 2 major scorers, with an even scale at the bottom. nobody is much better than anyone else, so have them all (all the decent ones) pitch in. guys like etienne and lepe are asked to do way too much right now. i mean, they should still be top of the pack of the bottom guys. but that might mean 3-4 distro with the rest of the guys at 1-2. only mercier should be 0.


2/6/2012 1:08 PM
some good ideas from some of the other posters. just a couple things i don't really agree with
- i see no problem leaving freeman at +1 or +2
- do NOT run uptempo in any circumstance with this team

some things i do agree with:
- scudder definitely should not be a - setting
- scudder will have better numbers as he gets more shots, that is small sample size
- freeman is definitely jacking it up too little
- etiennne should thrive from a backup spot
- playing a - setting 2/3 or at least not a plus is probably a good idea. i know zone less than anything, but a - setting will help your rebounding, which you need help with
2/6/2012 1:13 PM

billy - out of curiosity, why wouldn't you run up-tempo under ANY circumstance? Even against lesser SIM opponents that are also not as deep? Is it because his top two scorers should be on the floor as much as possible with the distro's you are recommending?

I'm not criticizing (look at my record, I still have plenty to learn) - just wondering the reasoning behind it.

2/6/2012 2:36 PM
Posted by deer454 on 2/6/2012 2:36:00 PM (view original):

billy - out of curiosity, why wouldn't you run up-tempo under ANY circumstance? Even against lesser SIM opponents that are also not as deep? Is it because his top two scorers should be on the floor as much as possible with the distro's you are recommending?

I'm not criticizing (look at my record, I still have plenty to learn) - just wondering the reasoning behind it.

no problem - i am always more than happy to explain my rationale. i think people often fail to make the distinction of questioning and being disrespectful on these forums. most coaches (myself included) don't mind being questioned. its all the ****** attitudes in the posts that ruins these forums!

i guess for starters, i am a strongly anti-uptempo coach. supposedly, the best time to play uptempo is when you have the better team. but i extensively experimented with tempo back when i had teams way better than your typical best in the nation type teams - and uptempo was worse than normal even if i was a 90% favorite. while it might not have really hurt your AVERAGE margin of victory, the volatility certainly increased, resulting in avoidable losses. and those teams were basically the ideal case for uptempo, according to these forums - incredibly deep, more talented, super fast, great bh/pass, etc. somewhere around 98% or so chance to win a game, i couldn't really tell the difference. but that is so small a margin, i don't know if its because at some point, uptempo is really the way to go, or not. but then again - played press - which really does not go well with uptempo.

anyway, that said, if you look at his situation, i think the reality is his 4 top players (non sf) are really his best chance. hes a zone team, so he has the opportunity to run those 4 players hard, and have a decent team. thats his best chance, by a long shot, at least as best i can tell. so i definitely would not want to run uptempo and reduce their playing time.

the other thing about uptempo is this - it reduces your offensive efficiency in the half court. the old claim by CS was that it breaks even - but thats just a generalization, a stereotype, not the reality. the reality is it reduces your offensive efficiency in the half court, which is largely offset by increased fast break ops - so a small % of your total shots, you have a much higher chance to make it, and a large % of your total shots, you have a slightly lower chance to make it. these can somewhat even out (my opinion is they usually don't). well, to me, his offense is not very deep at all. his raw lp and per skills are not very good. rushing it in the half court sounds like a pretty bad idea to me - because when u take those less open shots, you are going to get in trouble. on the other hand, for fast breaks, he really doesn't have the great bh/pass/spd you would want to take advantage of that. so i just don't see him breaking even, or coming close to it.
2/6/2012 3:08 PM
Posted by coach_billyg on 2/6/2012 3:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by deer454 on 2/6/2012 2:36:00 PM (view original):

billy - out of curiosity, why wouldn't you run up-tempo under ANY circumstance? Even against lesser SIM opponents that are also not as deep? Is it because his top two scorers should be on the floor as much as possible with the distro's you are recommending?

I'm not criticizing (look at my record, I still have plenty to learn) - just wondering the reasoning behind it.

no problem - i am always more than happy to explain my rationale. i think people often fail to make the distinction of questioning and being disrespectful on these forums. most coaches (myself included) don't mind being questioned. its all the ****** attitudes in the posts that ruins these forums!

i guess for starters, i am a strongly anti-uptempo coach. supposedly, the best time to play uptempo is when you have the better team. but i extensively experimented with tempo back when i had teams way better than your typical best in the nation type teams - and uptempo was worse than normal even if i was a 90% favorite. while it might not have really hurt your AVERAGE margin of victory, the volatility certainly increased, resulting in avoidable losses. and those teams were basically the ideal case for uptempo, according to these forums - incredibly deep, more talented, super fast, great bh/pass, etc. somewhere around 98% or so chance to win a game, i couldn't really tell the difference. but that is so small a margin, i don't know if its because at some point, uptempo is really the way to go, or not. but then again - played press - which really does not go well with uptempo.

anyway, that said, if you look at his situation, i think the reality is his 4 top players (non sf) are really his best chance. hes a zone team, so he has the opportunity to run those 4 players hard, and have a decent team. thats his best chance, by a long shot, at least as best i can tell. so i definitely would not want to run uptempo and reduce their playing time.

the other thing about uptempo is this - it reduces your offensive efficiency in the half court. the old claim by CS was that it breaks even - but thats just a generalization, a stereotype, not the reality. the reality is it reduces your offensive efficiency in the half court, which is largely offset by increased fast break ops - so a small % of your total shots, you have a much higher chance to make it, and a large % of your total shots, you have a slightly lower chance to make it. these can somewhat even out (my opinion is they usually don't). well, to me, his offense is not very deep at all. his raw lp and per skills are not very good. rushing it in the half court sounds like a pretty bad idea to me - because when u take those less open shots, you are going to get in trouble. on the other hand, for fast breaks, he really doesn't have the great bh/pass/spd you would want to take advantage of that. so i just don't see him breaking even, or coming close to it.
So if you are saying uptempo lowers your efficiency in the halfcourt. . does that mean that, for example on my team, you would play more slowdown?  My main strength currently is frontcourt depth and 'experience'.  SO under what you were talking about, would you think that would work better at something other than a fast pace?  Or would depth outweigh that?  I just never really thought of it as having that much of an effect, and usually I end up with guard centered teams as opposed to what I have this year.

2/6/2012 3:52 PM
12 Next ▸

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.