Two Recruiting Sessions (poll) Topic

This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
kcsundevil
Posts: 2294 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 89 35 4
Prospect
I voted more problems than worth. My vote for worst 3.0 change would be publishing the misleading stretched odds numbers after battles.
2/1/2018 8:45 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
thewizard17
Posts: 1933 (0)
Hall of Famer
107 1
Prospect
I thought that's what we had right now? The first session is in-season, while the second session is off-season. If it results in the season being longer, then I'd probably be against it.
2/1/2018 11:18 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Yeah, it is what we have.
2/2/2018 6:52 AM
fd343ny
Posts: 2254 (0)
Hall of Famer
7 631 36
Veteran
This is so fundamental to 3.0 that cant imagine changing. There are effects of the split that I think are a problem, but they could be fixed without getting rid of it. Problems for new coaches. Unexpected EEs. A few others
2/2/2018 11:20 AM
shoe3
Posts: 4168 (0)
Hall of Famer
413 12 6
Veteran
I love it. It’s realistic, it’s strategic, it emphasizes planning and prioritization. And it bugs Benis. Plus all the way around.
2/2/2018 11:23 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
shoe3
Posts: 4168 (0)
Hall of Famer
413 12 6
Veteran
Posted by Benis on 2/2/2018 11:30:00 AM (view original):
Thanks to CoachSpud and Poopshoe for both voting twice!
You’re always welcome.

Still not quite as unpopular as you thought, huh?
2/2/2018 11:31 AM
shoe3
Posts: 4168 (0)
Hall of Famer
413 12 6
Veteran
How do (you) feel about 3.0 splitting recruiting to an in-season session and an offseason session?

fixed it for (you)
2/2/2018 11:32 AM
shoe3
Posts: 4168 (0)
Hall of Famer
413 12 6
Veteran
Funny that you can hide posts by reporting. Too bad you can’t hide votes.
2/2/2018 11:34 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
shoe3
Posts: 4168 (0)
Hall of Famer
413 12 6
Veteran
Posted by Benis on 2/2/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Pretty even split so far

13 in favor. 13 against. 10 who don't care.
Weird. From what you said on the other thread, you seemed pretty sure “most” people hated it.
2/2/2018 11:41 AM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
Posted by Benis on 2/2/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Pretty even split so far

13 in favor. 13 against. 10 who don't care.
You're not accounting for those who aren't voting. 250 per world, 10 worlds. Let's just say half of that to account for those with more than 1 team. So the number is.....

13 in favor, 13 against, 1214 who don't care.
2/2/2018 11:48 AM
1|2|3...8 Next ▸
Two Recruiting Sessions (poll) Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.