prestige doesn’t mean enough Topic

From: Josh W______
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 2:16 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: the actual power of prestige




The actual power of prestige is, I think, not powerful enough in relation to the perceived (and probably more appropriate) power of prestige.



This is Colorblind79, by the way…coach of the University of Maryland in Crum.



I was the national championship runner up and had a very strong A+ prestige (I was already at A+ before having six players drafted). I faced a very difficult battle against the University of Virginia for a local recruit. I probably could have won it with $30k in effort or so. I spent more than that, ultimately, because I was not going to fill all of my slots and my funds would go to waste otherwise…but I did not make that expenditure for some time.



Now, Virginia had 3 open spots and the same tournament success money that I did, since we’re from the same conference, but whereas I was coming off of being the national DI runner-up, a Sweet 16, an NT appearance, another Sweet 16, and an Elite 8…Virginia missed the postseason entirely last year, and in the past 9 seasons has compiled three PIT appearances, one of which lead to the championship, for a B-minus prestige.



Now, what five-star recruit would ever choose UVA over UMD with those set of facts? Provided that UMD extended a reasonable amount of effort in recruiting them, say $10k worth for a local kid, UVA shouldn’t be able to compete at all. Yet by putting his entire budget into this one recruit, he made me vulnerable in my other battles. I did happen to win both of the battles that I was in, but that is besides the point, because I deliberately aimed low with three out of my available six scholarships (leaving one open, one went to a one-star JuCo big, the last I used to poach one of UVA’s recruits for a redshirt, as retribution – fair game in my opinion).



Generally speaking, B-minus prestige programs and coaches will respect the theory of the game enough to defer to A+ programs and coaches, and back off rather than entering into a full-fledged battle over a recruit. In this case, that deference was not there – and I feel justified in being irked at both the coach who decided to challenge me to such an extent and with the program that allowed him to do so as effectively as it did. Regardless of whether he spent $50k or $60k on Millard Hargraves’ recruitment, no self-respecting five-star recruit would duck out on the equivalent of a real-life UNC (which was extending the red carpet to him) to go to a conference doormat.



I think that the gap between high prestige and mediocre prestige schools needs to become more pronounced, in terms of the actual hard-wired option, in order to avoid this sort of situation in the future. Please give me a real response instead of “we’ll take it under advisement.” I realize that in general, coaches are loath to open a battle with an A+ program, but just because reality is mostly self-enforced doesn’t mean that the program itself should not reinforce that.



Thanks,



Joshua A. W______, Esq.

etc.
12/30/2009 1:21 PM
you actually signed Esq. to a forum post. am i seeing things?
12/30/2009 1:28 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By namshub on 12/30/2009you actually signed Esq. to a forum post. am i seeing things
I posted the e-mail I sent, which was from my work address so that's an automatic signature. But I didn't delete it, if that's what you're asking.
12/30/2009 1:32 PM
Let me get this straight. You think that A+ prestige schools should win all recruiting battles, regardless of effort?

You got outspent, maybe by 2 to 1. And you lost.

I think a real recruit might pick a NC State over a UNC if UNC offered him the regular amount of effort and the NC State said, "We want to build our program around you," which seems to be what happened. That doesn't seem that ridiculous to me.
12/30/2009 1:34 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By cornfused on 12/30/2009Let me get this straight. You think that A+ prestige schools should win all recruiting battles, regardless of effort?

You got outspent, maybe by 2 to 1. And you lost.

I think a real recruit might pick a NC State over a UNC if UNC offered him the regular amount of effort and the NC State said, "We want to build our program around you," which seems to be what happened. That doesn't seem that ridiculous to me
I didn't lose, actually - and I promised him a starting spot and 15 minutes of playing time. I'm not saying A+ schools should win every battle, but it shouldn't even be a battle with a school that hasn't done anything, making the same promises as a school that just got 6 guys into the NBA.
12/30/2009 1:35 PM
Michael Beasley went to K-State.

OJ Mayo went to USC.

I could go on, but I don't need to because this argument is silly.

A+ teams have plenty of advantage. Just because they have difficult battles here or there doesn't mean the pendulum should be swung any farther to their side.
12/30/2009 1:41 PM
OJ Mayo called the coach at USC and recruited himself, because it was a major media market. Michael Beasley was following his AAU coach, who had been made an assistant at KState. Those don't relate to WIS.
12/30/2009 1:48 PM
Color: It happens a good but not great team put most of his resources into one player. You had to allocate a large percentage to keep him. That is what the game is really about allocation of resources. If we make it where the middle of the road teams have NO CHANCE against the big boys.,, it would be to the detriment of the game HD has problems. This is not one of them
12/30/2009 1:55 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By kannc6 on 12/30/2009
Color: It happens a good but not great team put most of his resources into one player. You had to allocate a large percentage to keep him. That is what the game is really about allocation of resources. If we make it where the middle of the road teams have NO CHANCE against the big boys.,, it would be to the detriment of the game HD has problems. This is not one of them
Team History
SeasonCoachOverall
W-L
Home
W-L
Road
W-L
Neutral
W-L
Conf
W-L
RankRPIPrestigeNotes
36[redacted]0-00-00-00-00-00-
35[redacted]18-1011-46-51-19-7104B-
34[redacted]16-139-57-70-17-984B-PI (2nd Round)
33[redacted]15-1310-44-81-16-1090B-
32[redacted]15-1310-45-80-18-881B-PI (1st Round)
31[redacted]9-185-74-100-17-9147B-
30[redacted]19-1310-47-82-16-1042BPI Champion
29[redacted]8-196-72-110-14-12210C+
28[redacted]14-148-75-61-18-8130B-
27[redacted]10-176-94-70-16-10132B
----------

This is mediocre at best, far from "good." If he were in a different conference his prestige would be a C, not a B-minus.

I'm sure you can figure out who the other coach is but I figured it might be extra unsportsmanlike to plaster this on the main page here.

[edit:]

compare with...

SeasonCoachOverall
W-L
Home
W-L
Road
W-L
Neutral
W-L
Conf
W-L
RankRPIPrestigeNotes
36colorblind790-00-00-00-00-00-
35colorblind7932-314-110-18-114-221A+Conf Champion
CT Champion
NT (Championship Game)
34colorblind7921-910-29-52-212-4156AConf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (Sweet 16)
33colorblind7917-1110-37-60-210-633ANT At-large Bid
NT (1st Round)
32colorblind7926-611-211-24-213-393AConf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (Sweet 16)
31colorblind7924-912-36-56-111-5914A-CT Champion
NT (Elite 8)
30colorblind7912-1611-40-111-15-11118B
29colorblind7917-138-67-52-29-745B+NT At-large Bid
NT (1st Round)
28colorblind7917-1110-56-51-19-7109B+
27Sim AI4-234-80-140-11-15251A
12/30/2009 1:59 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By colorblind79 on 12/30/2009
OJ Mayo called the coach at USC and recruited himself, because it was a major media market. Michael Beasley was following his AAU coach, who had been made an assistant at KState. Those don't relate to WIS.

CB, nice deflection. There are hundreds of examples over the years of top players going to second tier schools, and there are thousands of examples of top players almost going to second tier schools over first tier schools, which is what it sounds like happened in your case. I don't see why either shouldn't happen in a college basketball SIM every once in a while.

Maryland just landed the #4, #22 and #34 overall players. You're seriously complaining that recruiting isn't easy enough?
12/30/2009 2:06 PM
Prestige power in recruiting is fine. No need to give the As any more power then they already do, it would be crippling to many schools. The only valid complaint that might relate to prestige is the fact that in HD they can't recruit nationwide and irl they can.
12/30/2009 2:09 PM
Ok mediocre then, but still the opinion of the vast majority of coaches is that the top programs (and I have A and A- prestige D-1 teams) get a pretty good deal.

Now we can argue recruiting is broken and A+, A schools should recruit nationally. (yes they should), but top players go all the time to less than A+ schools IRL and it comes off as crying that you had to spend some $$ to land a top player
12/30/2009 2:10 PM
I'll be blunt with my opinion: Hamstringing mediocre teams in elite conferences even more than they already are from going after top tier talent is an awful idea. It would make the rich even richer and the poor even poorer, resulting in even less competitive BCS conferences.

Keeping a big name DI BCS school at A or A+ prestige is one of the easiest things to do in this game (getting there is the hard part), so let's not make it even easier.
12/30/2009 2:14 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By fussyd on 12/30/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colorblind79 on 12/30/2009

OJ Mayo called the coach at USC and recruited himself, because it was a major media market. Michael Beasley was following his AAU coach, who had been made an assistant at KState. Those don't relate to WIS.

CB, nice deflection. There are hundreds of examples over the years of top players going to second tier schools, and there are thousands of examples of top players almost going to second tier schools over first tier schools, which is what it sounds like happened in your case. I don't see why either shouldn't happen in a college basketball SIM every once in a while.

Maryland just landed the #4, #22 and #34 overall players. You're seriously complaining that recruiting isn't easy enough?

Considering that this is essentially a blind auction, without Herb Pope type irrationality entering into it, with no automatic "yes" from guys who grew up dreaming about playing at your school, and no realistic use of booster gifts (or sexual favors from "hostesses", or whatever)...yeah, it's a pain in the *** that my little brother from Charlottesville doesn't content himself with three-star guys and the occasional four-star guy that neither I nor Georgetown wants, for whatever reason, and keeps diving for my knees.

This isn't the real world, where College Park, Maryland is a run-down town on the outskirts of DC, with crappy restaurants, three bars, and no charm outside of the campus itself; and Charlottesville is literally labelled as the best town to live in in America. That's not included in here - this is purely about who has the prestige from their program, and who has the scholarships open to recruit guys. I had 3 more scholarships than he did, and loads more to offer. Was it too hard? I wouldn't say so if I was battling Georgetown, an A-minus school. We're talking about a 1 and 2/3 grade difference in prestige here. These are different leagues. He should be in the kiddie pool, where he belongs.
12/30/2009 2:17 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By colorblind79 on 12/30/2009
Considering that this is essentially a blind auction,

Exactly, so why shouldn't there be a system in which Mr. Deep Pockets gets pushed every once in a while?
12/30/2009 2:26 PM
12345 Next ▸
prestige doesn’t mean enough Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.