Owners In:
1.  Sweg - Ohio State/Duke
2.  Felonius - California/UCLA
3.  All3 - Michigan State/UCLA
4.  Eleibowitz - UNC/Kansas
5.  Malone9975 - Michigan St/Kansas
6.  Caldreaming - UNC/Texas
7.  ff09 - Illinois/Georgetown   
8.  Vancem - Oregon State/Houston    

Backcourts (PG-SF) Taken:
Cal
Michigan State (2) done
UNC (2) done
Illinois
The Ohio State University
Oregon State

Frontcourts (SF-C) Taken:
UCLA (2) - done
Kansas (2) - done
Texas
Georgetown
Duke
Houston

Berkley back court/UCLA front court

A Theme League where I can unite Magic and Kareem?  Count me in!

Backcourt - Michigan State
Front Court - UCLA 

Ok im in

Backcourt-North Carolina
Frontcourt- Kansas

Kansas frontcourt
Michigan State backcourt

Texas front court
UNC back court

I'll post my combo now of The Ohio State University for backcourt and Duke University for frontcourt.

Yes, where you play the players is up to you.  If you have a SF that is 100% he can come from your backcourt or frontcourt.  If he is a frontcourt SF (100%) you can play him at SG or PG, but the season you use must have him as a 100% SF.  Make sense?

I'm amazed at all the great options there are for this league.  It is surprising to me that folks seems to have focused in on a few schools.

thanks sweg, thats how i read it, but wanted to be sure.

I tell you what I've spent a lot of time thinking about this league. I'm buzzed right now but please bear with me. . . WHY NOT ALLOW TEAMS TO COMBINE THE SF POSITION BETWEEN THE TWO SCHOOLS? THE PGs and SGs must all come from one school. The PFs and C's must all come from one school? Also the SFs can play at either PG,SG,.PF or the C position if,  and only if, they are 100% at any other of those positions. 

Just asking? I am interested.

Posted by sweg on 8/11/2011 4:32:00 PM (view original):
I'm amazed at all the great options there are for this league.  It is surprising to me that folks seems to have focused in on a few schools.

Not many schools offer the depth/choices that UCLA for example does.