I'm not going to pretend that I'm all that special of a coach or that my team is all that amazing, but I have a D3 squad that has 59 ATH and 62 DEF. Both rankings would put me in the top 25 of D2 teams. I'm in the same D3 conference with Maine, Farmington. The conference is good enough that my team ended up losing 7 times in conference play. One of our other teams is run by a terrific coach, has a team overall rating of 615, and ended up losing 9 (!) times to conference foes.
Just because Maine, Farmington only won twice in conference play, it doesn't mean they aren't one of the top 96 teams in D3. And has been pointed out, they've already won two games in the PIT.
I'm biased since I'm sort of standing up for my conference mate here. But at the same time I really don't think restricting this team from the postseason is a good idea. It isn't like it is easy to still be ranked highly in the Projection Report with a 10-17 record.
The one thing that might make sense is maybe making some kind of eligibility for D1. A 10-17 team making the postseason is almost for sure going to come from a BCS conference and that team benefits from baseline prestige as well as the big recruiting benefits that come from the money the BCS conferences make. If they can't do better than 10-17, I'm not going to shed tears. The D2 and D3 teams don't get that benefit so I don't see any problem with a 10-17 team going to the postseason from the lesser divisions.
10/28/2012 11:17 PM (edited)