Posted by t22u on 7/21/2013 9:19:00 AM (view original):
It depends. I start with as few as possible, and spend more if I don't find any recruits that meet my standard. But typically I try to stay under 25%. At the DII level though I would disagree with your assumption that staying within 360 miles is a must, it's a plus but you typically have enough budget to go further. For example, at my Seattle team in Allen I have 2 players that were within 360 miles, but when I was coaching at Adams St. (CO) I recruited a lot more local guys because there were more of them.
http://www.whatifsports.com/forums/Posts.aspx?ForumID=30&TopicID=453763&ThreadID=9829131#l_9829131
That is a link to a post that really helped me. It's well written and will help make you successful at DII.
The conventional wisdom rule of <360 miles is not a "must". It's merely a principle of economics.
At 350 miles, 1x HV runs about $444 and 1x ST about $294. That's $1.27 and $0.84 per mile, respectively.
At 360 (10 more miles) costs jump to $747 for an HV ($2.09/mile) and $530 ($1.47/mile) for an ST -- or between 1.5 and 1.8 times the costs of < 350 miles. The 350/360 mile mark is easily recognizable on a graph showing distance vs cost. At no other breaking point do costs/mile spike that much.
It's not a requirement. It's a simple matter of efficiency. At D2 and D3, not many teams have the budget to try to pull down at long ranges with regularity -- and that's assuming that recruits are as convinceable at long ranges as they are at short range (which doesn't agree with my experience).
Once distance exceeds about 700-750 miles, the per-mile rate drops again, but by that time the problem is total cost more so than cost/mile.
As for total FSS expenditures, I always scout my home state as early as possible. I build a spreadsheet of all the recruits I've located who have the attributes I'm after and then the spreadsheet totals targets per state - that determines which, if any, additional states I might purchase early on. I rarely buy additional states until later in the cycles, possibly after signings begin when they're much cheaper, but they're all based on the number of attractive targets I've found in those states.
In recruiting, information is power. You can spend $400 on an FSS report to find out that a recruit's potentials suck and decide not to pitch him, but it's still cheaper than $1,500 to $2,000 for that initial batch of HVs or STs.