Posted by jaymc2007 on 9/23/2014 9:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dave456 on 9/23/2014 9:01:00 PM (view original):
I don't think tempo should impact the number of shots your team takes in a game, as compared to your opponent. I think you should look at the difference in rebounds, turnovers, and FTs in the box score for the explanation, then work to understand the cause of the specific differences.
You don't think so at all? I think I might. Because if I am playing somebody who runs slowdown, he is going to take a lot less shots that someone I play who runs uptempo, therefore giving me more/less possessions.
Now the shot difference between slowdown vs slowdown, normal vs normal like he stated would have to do with difference of TOs, FTs, offensive rebounds, etc. like you said.
It doesn't make sense that differing tempos would lead to different shot totals. If I'm playing slowdown and you're playing uptempo, we still essentially take turns having possessions. It's not like you get bonus possessions, like your team could lap mine or something. As noted above, the difference comes down to rebounds, turnovers, and fouls.
Thought experiment - conditions are that you're running uptempo and I'm running slowdown, nobody ever turns the ball over, nobody ever fouls:
Scenario 1: Both of our teams make 100% of our shots. You bring the ball up the court quickly and make your shot. We bring the ball up slowly and make our shot. Rinse, repeat. How do you make a shot difference greater than one out of that?
Scenario 2: Both of our teams miss every shot, and nobody gets any offensive rebounds. You bring the ball up quickly and miss. We bring the ball up slowly and miss. Rinse, repeat. How do you get ahead in number of shots?
...and so on. Short version (tooooooooooo late!): Can you construct a scenario in which you gain an advantage in shots taken *without* a difference in turnovers, fouls, or offensive rebounds?