Anyone knows the stats of owners and vacancies by world ?

I believe their was a thread,  but don't know if its updated, heres a quick one for Tark, Knight, Phelan, Rupp:

Knight 315/984  32%
D3 80 humans / 384 school 21% human coached
D2 107 /276 39%
D1 128/324 40%

Tark 357/984 36%
D3: 108/384 28%
D2: 105/276 38%
D1: 144/324 44%

Phelan 354/984 36%
D3: 93/384 24%
D2: 111/276 40%
D1: 150/324 46%

Rupp: 332/984 34%
D3: 97/384 25%
D2: 107/276 39%
D1: 128/324 40%

So basically worlds are about 1/3 full overall
D3 ~25% full
D2 ~40%
D1 ~42%

Naismith
D3 -129
D2 - 125
D1 - 136

Openings will be coming up in a few days, our NT is playing the Elite Eight tonight. 

Crum:
D3 - 84.
D2 - 93.
D1 - 135.

Wooden:
D3 - 109.
D2 - 106.
D1 - 120.

Thanks

It's funny actually, the 2x/worlds were getting **** on in another thread for not having as much competition as the 1x/worlds and it looks like, at first glance, the 2x/worlds are every bit as full as the 1x/day worlds, if not moreso.

To me personally, and I know it's been discussed ad nauseum, those numbers say combine some worlds. Problem is, no simple, good, fair or pleasing way to do it.

I've had one team for "almost" a century's worth of seasons. I've had another for close to 60. Were I to have to give those teams up, I'd probably choose to leave the game and therein lies one of the biggest problems, coaches who have been at certain particular schools for more than a handful (literally) of real world calendars.

Instead of reducing worlds, they could spend even a minimum of effort to improve the game so more people would play. How many coaches have tried the game and given up or gotten bored and quit? If you even could recapture 20 percent of those, you could probably fill all the worlds. I don't aspire to have full usage but only 20 percent of D3 with humans is terrible. At least 50/50 should be a minimum. I wish I had the cash to buy WIS. I could run it so vastly better than Fox Sports.

I think Tarkanian and Phelan are too of the most competitive worlds. Naismith is the top world. So... I am going to remain in these.

Pricing. 

It wasn't so expensive........they might be able to double those numbers.  Maybe not.

Posted by hoosierkyle on 2/1/2015 11:03:00 AM (view original):
Pricing. 

It wasn't so expensive........they might be able to double those numbers.  Maybe not.

at lest make a 3 season pack for like $20 it gives new players a chance to actuqlly test the game out before shelving out major cash, 1 season doesnt even give you fss the most important aspect of the game. 

There is no incentive for them to close or combine worlds.  it's not like there is effort involved in keeping worlds open.

It would be nice if they did something.  

I see all these suggestion threads that pop up - and I just think NOBODY is LISTENING!

Does anyone have numbers for Iba, Smith and Allen?

Posted by brianxavier on 2/1/2015 5:20:00 PM (view original):
There is no incentive for them to close or combine worlds.  it's not like there is effort involved in keeping worlds open.

It would be nice if they did something.  

I see all these suggestion threads that pop up - and I just think NOBODY is LISTENING!

threre is no incentive for them to do anything.  they have a userbase big enough to satisfy that pays them enough money and i dont know how much they spend on this game but they are probably spending minimal.  there is no reason for them to change anytjing until people really start complaining