I see a lot of topics on what could be done to improve the game. A lot of them call for the Fox Company or Seble to make changes to the game. We also have all learned that changes are, um, few and far between, let's say (and I'm not sure that's a bad thing). The real question is, what can we as players do to improve the game? I have a short list, I'm sure others have more/better ideas.
1. Recruit more coaches. Word of mouth, internet sites, whatever, we need more coaches trying the game. I know a recent post said go to college basketball sites for schools like Syracuse and post there. I wonder though, do we really need more players who are going to want to get to their favorite DI school, realize it is going to take a long time to do so, and therefore end up quitting. I think in a perfect world, we actually need guys who are fans of certain DII and DIII schools (think mfnmyers at Dickenson). Don't get me wrong, any coaches would be great, but I would think we have a better retention rate with guys whose favorite team in real life is a DII or DIII school (no data to back that up, just guessing). How do we reach those people? Well, like I said above, that is for better minds than mine to figure out.
2. Treat new coaches like gold. When you see a new coach, reach out to them. Heck, if you see a veteran coach who is struggling, reach out to them. Help them be successful as soon as possible (within the rules of the game of course, I'm not saying to collude during recruiting or anything like that). Make sure they know about the forums and all the great information that can be found there.
3. Okay, this one will never fly, but we could theoretically take care of firings ourselves. We would need to come up with a group of requirements for Big 6 schools (I figure only Big 6 schools), probably based off of baseline prestige (the better the baseline prestige the higher the requirements to keep the job) and maybe 5 year contracts. If you meet the requirements, you get another 5 year contract. If not, a person or two in each world would have the job of keeping track of contract years and checking all Big 6 jobs to see who should be fired. They would then be asked to either change jobs at the start of the job process or not renew and wait until after the job process, when they could take any job they wanted. Again, I know this is unrealistic as some coaches simply wouldn't listen and wouldn't fire themselves and we'd never be able to agree on minimum requirements to keep jobs, but it was one out of the box idea that we theoretically could implement.
I like reading the "whatif" whatif did this topics, but as a few people have said recently, they are just purely debate because we can't make those changes. I think if we start to think about what we can do, we could make positive changes to the game. Now, do we care enough about the game to do Fox's job for them, I'm not sure? But we do have some options.