Posted by TRrrr on 5/4/2016 3:39:00 PM (view original):
Yea, I would expect after 10 seasons to qualify for a B or B+ opening.
Reputation A+
Loyalty A+
Brought a program that never had prestige above C- to B-.
It's about all that can be done at N. Mexico St.
Thought that 10 years would open up some better opportunities.
Taking the Oregon job is masochistic.
I've done that before at Nebraska. No thanks.
ps- all the B6 jobs available are for teams that are much worse then what I have now. How is that logical?
oregon job can be pretty good depending on who is around it. i think those 4 NW pac10 bcs jobs really depend on each other, and stanford. if stanford and only 1 of them is A range, it can be a very competitive program. i've seen if where 3 of the 5 have been A range and competitive, but its definitely tough, and absolutely seems there is no room for 4.
its probably not popular, but i actually don't think you should be b/b+ qualified - you only had 1 NT win in the period, and it was like 6 seasons ago.
the job logic is definitely too hard, but the thing is, if a b+ bcs job opens up, thats a DAMN attractive job. you should need more than half NT1s and half PITs with one NT2 a while back, for a job that good. i think you'd need 2-3 NT wins fairly recently, to qualify for that good of a job. but, i can also see the argument that just let them be qualified and let the best man win. its just not exactly fair to leap-frog over lower BCS programs with that level of success, IMO. you'd have to reduce the qualifications for low BCS to like, making the PIT most of the time, with maybe a NT appearance or two. thats pretty low. i don't think it should be QUITE that low, although obviously, i agree w/ all you guys that the current job logic is crap and is much too restrictive.
and besides - it is logical - guys who go to low BCS jobs, usually take over programs that haven't been to the NT in the last several seasons or maybe just once, and they are making it from mid major programs. the program itself is better, the current state of it, is not. same deal here. you definitely should not be able to go from a team who can make the NT to a team who can win NT games, without having to do some building in between - like you shouldnt leave the one program and move to the next and immediately have more talented teams. that seems totally unrealistic to me. so, i guess i think this is a bit of high expectations combined with a fairly severely broken system.