Posted by terps21234 on 6/13/2018 9:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by shoe3 on 6/13/2018 9:24:00 PM (view original):
By definition, making a final four is always unlikely. In a game with many dozens of competitors - presumably a few handfuls of whom will know what they’re doing - you really can’t have a team head and shoulders far enough ahead to say winning 4 tournament games in a row is “likely”.
You’ll have a good shot, certainly better than most, to make a final four run. Ideally, you’d have a little higher team athleticism and rebounding, but you can play/coach around that, you have other strengths. Your stamina is fine, as long as you’ve managed your depth chart to account for the positions that could get thin.
Good luck.
Thanks shoe. I managed my Depth chart going 4 deep in every position except PF and C, I go 3 deep there. I hope i can coach around the low reb in bigs with guards getting some. My def and reb will grow by end of season. We shall see.
To maximize the effectiveness of your thin front court, I would suggest the following frontcourt rotation:
C - King, Valenzuela, Costa, Lyon
PF - Hice, Lyon, Costa, Shepherd
SF - Lyon, Shepherd, Fletcher, Gonzalez
I don’t know what your depth chart looks like exactly, but basically, I’d be looking to get Lyon minutes at PF and/or C (while keeping his starting spot). Since his stamina is considerably better than Hice (who is better suited to PF than C on your squad), setting up your depth chart this way should normally have Lyon moving over to the 4 at the 1st substitution, with Shepherd coming in at SF. You have better depth at guard, so when they’re on the floor together and you’re playing small, I’d rather have Lyon at PF or C and Shepherd at SF.
Obviously, feel free to ignore the unsolicited advice. But if you do find yourself having trouble keeping fresh, effective bigs in the game, using Lyon up there may help.