is there a limit on the number of ineligibles you can sign? For example, if I had 6 openings, could I ink 6 ineligibles?

Posted by WardoYT on 1/7/2020 7:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by mg050369 on 1/7/2020 6:43:00 PM (view original):
is there a limit on the number of ineligibles you can sign? For example, if I had 6 openings, could I ink 6 ineligibles?

You'll get eaten alive by the cpu bot aided to cut down cheated and AMI cops are said to be used in the effort to clean up the scraps of the game.

Thank you. You have been a tremendous help.

Posted by mg050369 on 1/7/2020 8:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by WardoYT on 1/7/2020 7:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by mg050369 on 1/7/2020 6:43:00 PM (view original):
is there a limit on the number of ineligibles you can sign? For example, if I had 6 openings, could I ink 6 ineligibles?

You'll get eaten alive by the cpu bot aided to cut down cheated and AMI cops are said to be used in the effort to clean up the scraps of the game.

Thank you. You have been a tremendous help.

No problem

Posted by WardoYT on 1/7/2020 7:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by mg050369 on 1/7/2020 6:43:00 PM (view original):
is there a limit on the number of ineligibles you can sign? For example, if I had 6 openings, could I ink 6 ineligibles?

You'll get eaten alive by the cpu bot aided to cut down cheated and AMI cops are said to be used in the effort to clean up the scraps of the game.

What about the old secret C++ coding that they converted into non-scriptual calculations that regurgitate that algorithm that you created for whatifsports all the way back in 1968, a year before you helped the US land on the moon at the tender age of 1?

Posted by metsmaniac2 on 1/7/2020 8:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by WardoYT on 1/7/2020 7:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by mg050369 on 1/7/2020 6:43:00 PM (view original):
is there a limit on the number of ineligibles you can sign? For example, if I had 6 openings, could I ink 6 ineligibles?

You'll get eaten alive by the cpu bot aided to cut down cheated and AMI cops are said to be used in the effort to clean up the scraps of the game.

What about the old secret C++ coding that they converted into non-scriptual calculations that regurgitate that algorithm that you created for whatifsports all the way back in 1968, a year before you helped the US land on the moon at the tender age of 1?

Age 11 and I used non electrical engines with Solar Panels instead of fuel... Look it up can not be solved by 5-6 years old. However I will tell you this my family has one of the largest Astrology charts in the world and it was my job through the childhood to run a fake chart not of the old one. I have a good Astro Office probably better than Nasa head corp. You can't build a earth model till 11 and that is like grade 1-7. It is actually A++ C++ is used for rough estimates of everything else that includes people lying in their chat.

file the Wardo replies under entertainment

There are a handful of examples of teams with 2 nonqualfiiers. Dont think I have ever heard of more. Doesnt mean not possible, but I would not be surprised if the engine resisted that.

I am assuming we are talking DI

Posted by fd343ny on 1/7/2020 10:02:00 PM (view original):
file the Wardo replies under entertainment

There are a handful of examples of teams with 2 nonqualfiiers. Dont think I have ever heard of more. Doesnt mean not possible, but I would not be surprised if the engine resisted that.

I am assuming we are talking DI

No DI bud he is talking Under the table Ineligibles that can canned you and is over the Red Barron.

I've heard of 3 being signed on one roster. And I think someone wrote that here in the forums. But I don't have the time currently to look for it

Not sure if there is an exact limit

why is wardo such an idiot

we always have to have one...remember the fury days? (or daze in his case)....

Posted by jacqui214 on 1/10/2020 8:03:00 AM (view original):
we always have to have one...remember the fury days? (or daze in his case)....

the interesting thing about furry_nips is he ended up an alright dude. one time he posted this one post that offered an incredibly valuable insight into the then-recent d2/d3 changes, and that post spurred me to go investigate something and the result helped hugely. most folks wouldn't have shared something like that. at the time, he was still considered a total idiot and just written off, but he had actually become a decent guy by then.

i used to lump all 'the idiots' together, but i don't really anymore. i guess i have sort of softened on those young bomb thrower types (furry, colonels, tmacfan), the story of young folks joining a forum community and going off the rails, before gaining some respect for that community and moderating their approach, its as old as the internet itself. all those guys were decent members of the community before they quit.

real wardo, i sort of found him annoying but i don't think he was an ******* as much as he kinda made no sense. i definitely wouldn't lump him with the rest, he seemed like a nice enough guy. fake wardo, i don't really get how that is fun for whoever that is, but at least he's not a total *******, derailing any decent conversation.

i've concluded, its really the ettaexpresses of the world who are the problem. god i hated that guy. to be so strong headed while being so clueless, and having zero ability to change one's opinion in the slightest on even one subject, that was sort of terrifying. that's the sort of dude i could see shooting up a church.

of course, you also have lunatics like me, but i like to think i am less of an idiot than clinically insane

I just found this. Figured I'd share for data purposes. It's my sim opponent tonight.

https://imgur.com/a/m6hbAet

So 3 can be had. Haven't seen 4 on one roster yet.

Posted by topdogggbm on 2/1/2020 4:04:00 PM (view original):
I just found this. Figured I'd share for data purposes. It's my sim opponent tonight.

https://imgur.com/a/m6hbAet

So 3 can be had. Haven't seen 4 on one roster yet.

there is a long history of 'rules' of HD that apply to humans, but not sims. before 3.0, i had seem numerous examples of sim-only teams with multiple ineligibles, but never a single human one.

admin swears up and down its luck, but i guess i feel like over a decade of people basically saying 'yeah supposedly you can have 2 but nobody has ever pulled it off', someone would have 1) pulled off 2 and 2) posted about it. so i remain skeptical. wouldn't be surprised if it got quietly 'fixed' in 3.0.