Posted by beachhouse on 8/26/2020 6:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by kcsundevil on 8/26/2020 5:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by beachhouse on 8/26/2020 5:09:00 PM (view original):
Technically wouldn’t you want to play a full lineup though? Whichever team wins is probably your better chance at winning the NT anyways. Though playing against yourself seems counterproductive in non-conf.
If you can choose which of your two teams to advance in the NT, but you can only pick one:
Do you pick your A 62 - S 59 - R 25 - D 66 team?
Or do you pick your A 68 - S 50 - R 50 - D 80 team, which already beat your other team in a fair fight during the regular season?
I mean can you ever make it a fair fight when playing yourself?
For a half-dozen seasons after my son stopped playing and I took over this account, I had two teams in the same division in Naismith, moving shoe3 to Abilene Christian from Medgar Evers to stay in compliance with the mileage rule. Twice in the first 3 seasons, those two teams were in the same NT bracket. Both times, they would have played, except for a big upset - Davis and Elkins was beaten in the second round as a 1 seed in season #78, and Abilene Christian was beaten by a 14 seed in the first round in season #80. Part of me was kind of looking forward to the matchups, just out of curiosity. I was going to gameplan straight, I was honestly fascinated to see how they would fare, they were such different teams. Wasn’t meant to be. Ultimately moved on to D1 with the original handle because 3.0 was coming out, tensions were starting to run hot, and was starting to think twice about how much fun it would be if those two teams played in the tournament.
My 2c on this case is that it certainly does look worth reporting. This is the sort of “sabotage” that would have a real effect, if that is what we’re looking at.