I'm reading the document, and the evidence is extremely shoddy all around.
For example, let's look at the section titled, "Fake Ballot Manufacturing and Destruction of Legally Cast Real Ballots."
Here, the evidence is:
1. A UPS driver says he drove ballots from NY to Penn. We have no context around this, it's never been testified in court, it's literally just a UPS driver so he might have no idea what is going on, and the same guy claims that he also saw ghosts, so maybe not the best witness.
2. A photo in Pennsylvania somehow suggests that a person used a USB drive to put ballots onto a machine, we're supposed to believe one unnamed person that this both happened and is out of order with the normal procedure.
3. A box of ballots was seen on video at a counting station in Arizona. We're supposed to disregard the vast majority of evidence that this is NBD for no reason at all, because while Navarro brings up the debunks, he does not challenge them. He just says, "be skeptical lol."
4. One allegation from one court case in Arizona that ballots were destroyed; the case was tossed out by a judge because "“Plaintiffs append over 300 pages of attachments, which are only impressive for their volume... The various affidavits and expert reports are largely based on anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections.”
This is a key claim in the report, and all of the evidence for it is either debunked or obviously unreliable.