Posted by all3 on 4/19/2021 4:29:00 PM (view original):
You didn't know who Jerry Sandusky was?
Maybe pay a bit more attention to reality and a bit less to the Governmental gossip rags.

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/19/2021 8:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/19/2021 4:29:00 PM (view original):
You didn't know who Jerry Sandusky was?
Maybe pay a bit more attention to reality and a bit less to the Governmental gossip rags.

Good lord you’re deranged

1) I was responding to tang’s post, the OP, clearly, obviously; take a poll here and I’d bet not one single person would’ve thought I was responding to you.
2) why would you think I was responding to you? Is it because you’re seriously full of yourself and thought that a guy posting for years on a whatifsports message board wouldn’t have heard of Jerry Sandusky and must’ve been replying to you and your lame joke? Yeah that makes more sense.
3) it’s not always about you, is something a man of your age shouldn’t need told to them, yet here we are.
4) seriously weak “comeback” considering you appear to have the reading comprehension of a tick.
5) I’m still stunned you saw my post and assumed it meant I didn’t know who Sandusky was. What a bizarre way you navigate online posts.

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/19/2021 8:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/19/2021 4:29:00 PM (view original):
You didn't know who Jerry Sandusky was?
Maybe pay a bit more attention to reality and a bit less to the Governmental gossip rags.

Good lord you’re deranged

1) I was responding to tang’s post, the OP, clearly, obviously; take a poll here and I’d bet not one single person would’ve thought I was responding to you.
2) why would you think I was responding to you? Is it because you’re seriously full of yourself and thought that a guy posting for years on a whatifsports message board wouldn’t have heard of Jerry Sandusky and must’ve been replying to you and your lame joke? Yeah that makes more sense.
3) it’s not always about you, is something a man of your age shouldn’t need told to them, yet here we are.
4) seriously weak “comeback” considering you appear to have the reading comprehension of a tick.
5) I’m still stunned you saw my post and assumed it meant I didn’t know who Sandusky was. What a bizarre way you navigate online posts.

Posted by all3 on 4/20/2021 10:04:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/19/2021 8:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/19/2021 4:29:00 PM (view original):
You didn't know who Jerry Sandusky was?
Maybe pay a bit more attention to reality and a bit less to the Governmental gossip rags.

Good lord you’re deranged

1) I was responding to tang’s post, the OP, clearly, obviously; take a poll here and I’d bet not one single person would’ve thought I was responding to you.
2) why would you think I was responding to you? Is it because you’re seriously full of yourself and thought that a guy posting for years on a whatifsports message board wouldn’t have heard of Jerry Sandusky and must’ve been replying to you and your lame joke? Yeah that makes more sense.
3) it’s not always about you, is something a man of your age shouldn’t need told to them, yet here we are.
4) seriously weak “comeback” considering you appear to have the reading comprehension of a tick.
5) I’m still stunned you saw my post and assumed it meant I didn’t know who Sandusky was. What a bizarre way you navigate online posts.

Let's see, you make this very generic and general post immediately after mine

Huh?
(googles)
jesus.....christ

yet I should have known it was addressing somebody else? Yeah, I'm the one who has a bizarre way of navigating posts. As always, tell yourself whatever you need to to make it through the day. FWIW, there is no " comeback" in my Sandusky post at all, so once again, YOU are the one with the problem of interpretation. Finally, I have zero idea what you, or anyone else does or does not know. I'll readily admit I take too many posts too personal, but this time you are W - A - Y off base, even if I doubt (know) you'd ever admit such a thing.

Posted by tangplay on 4/22/2021 2:00:00 PM (view original):
You're right, the Republican party has fooled its base into thinking that they're moral puritans, meanwhile pedos get free reign to inspect underage genitals.