Posted by tangplay on 9/1/2022 1:19:00 AM (view original):
This has been studied for years and the explanation of fires is the most commonly accepted.
You're gonna have to not only provide a counter example, but explain how the conspiracy operates from a fundamental level. How many people know the truth and don't say anything, and how many people needed to sign off on murdering American citizens on a large scale, yet none of this has leaked to the public?
I'm not a ******* expert on these things but it also doesn't take an expert to figure out that flying a plane into a building with other buildings around it hadn't really been crash tested before. Obviously the results were going to be unprecedented.
There has NEVER been any credible evidence that explosions or anything else brought down WTC 7. It's fires. It's always been fires.
Maybe there's no credible evidence because our "journalists" are about as interested looking into WTC 7 (and the many inconsistencies in the official 911 story) as they are in doing a deep dive into who Epstein's clients were.
It's all a sham.
Btw, Martyr Made, a fantastic history podcast, did a deep dive 3 part series into Epstein and concluded that he was likely an agent of the Israeli govt. Fwiw