What is the proper role of government in the US? Topic

Well, yeah, that too.    If I make hand-carved toys and can make 6 per week but only sell 4-5, I don't really need to hire anyone.  So the "Businesses need to pull their heads out their *** and start hiring people" people don't make much sense.   Maybe the unemployed need to pull their heads out their ***** and start spending money they can't afford to spend. 
9/27/2011 2:18 PM
CORPORATIONS ARE PEOPLE TOO!

POOR THANGS
9/27/2011 2:30 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/27/2011 2:18:00 PM (view original):
Well, yeah, that too.    If I make hand-carved toys and can make 6 per week but only sell 4-5, I don't really need to hire anyone.  So the "Businesses need to pull their heads out their *** and start hiring people" people don't make much sense.   Maybe the unemployed need to pull their heads out their ***** and start spending money they can't afford to spend. 
Are you sure that you do not need to hire someone?..........like a full time salesman?
9/27/2011 3:43 PM
In this economic climate, yes, I'm sure. 
9/27/2011 3:54 PM
Another conservative with no sense of humor
9/27/2011 4:01 PM
I just thought you were serious.   "When in doubt, throw money at it" - battlecry of the liberal party circa 2011
9/27/2011 4:08 PM
9/27/2011 5:16 PM
I would not hire him.   He looks like a heavy drinker.
9/27/2011 5:44 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/27/2011 2:18:00 PM (view original):
Well, yeah, that too.    If I make hand-carved toys and can make 6 per week but only sell 4-5, I don't really need to hire anyone.  So the "Businesses need to pull their heads out their *** and start hiring people" people don't make much sense.   Maybe the unemployed need to pull their heads out their ***** and start spending money they can't afford to spend. 
One of the many problems I have with corporations is that they have absolutely no moral compass whatsoever.  They have no problem whatsoever in taking credits and tax breaks from a country and the very next day they outsource hundreds of jobs from that countries workforce to some 3rd world country.  They are always doing that sort of thing.

Meanwhile does the prices of their products go down while their costs of doing business goes down?  No way, profit is the only thing that matters to them, people dont at all.  They have no loyalty to us whatsoever, so why should we to them?
9/28/2011 11:22 PM
Posted by silentpadna on 9/27/2011 12:46:00 PM (view original):
Nice change of direction.  You implied in your post that conservatives wan't to de-regulate everything ("Thats a great idea, lets de-regulate everything completely (in the States only) and see the parties that big business have.  Then watch....."). 

I called you out on your strawman. 

You decide to construct a new one ("they simply cant be trusted with the welfare of the entire human species") instead.  You don't trust corporations as far as you can throw them, but you, your family, and your government depend on them every day.  You don't have roads because the government wants them.  You have roads because the government wants them and there are corporations capable of building them efficiently.  You don't have defense because the government wants it.  You have defense because your government wants it and there are corporations capable of serving that need efficiently.  You don't have abundant anything without the means to have that anything delivered efficiently by people (many of whom incorporate) who are capable of filling the market need. 

Conservatives don't trust the welfare of the human species to corporations.  They simply believe in free market principles.  When government gets in the way of that, you have economies that can't get out of their own way trying to grow.  Regulation needed?  Of course.  Conservatives want none?  Hardly.  Even the Constitution here provides power for the government to regulate.

You would go a lot further in a rational discussion of you didn't assume another's point of view.

 

So you have an irrational hate for corporations?  Good on ya.  Don't use them for anything.  See how far that takes you.  I don't imagine I'd see another post from you if you did considering your computer is built by a corporation (if not, then I'm sure the electronics on the inside are built by a corporation), the cord and plug are built by a corporation, your monitor (if it's separate) is built by a corporation, the shipping company that distributed it to your place or purchase is likely a corporation, the company that built your bicycle  is probably a corporation, the company that provided tires for your bicycle is probably a corporation, the maker of the light in your room is probably a corporation, the message boards you post on are provided by a corporation - all them with people at many different levels using talents to better themselves and their families.

Do some corporations behave psychotically?  Can't argue that.  Does that mean we shouldn't have any?  If so, make your point.

If you can cite a (real mainstream) conservative that believes in zero regulation of any kind, you're welcome to show you have a clue what you're talking about.

I didnt mean to imply that all conservatives want all regulations to be thrown out with the diapers.  But in general conservatives want a lot less regulation, they believe that the free market should run everything.  Obviously with the proof of the 2008 meltdown that sort of thing just doesnt work.  The majority of the west was screwed big time because they allowed their banks and insurance companies do nearly anything they wanted to do.  Meanwhile certain smarter countries say for instance Canada (who has much more regulations in place for these types of things) faired much better.

Corporations fill a need for us.  But are you saying that they are the only way to fill that need?  How about worker owned co-ops?  There are lots of them in N America, and more of them popping up everyday.  Thats a legitimate way to provide most of the services and products that we could possibly need in our day to day lives.  But in terms of those other services that a corporations setup still makes the most sense I advocate that regulations are desperately needed to protect all of us.  You can go ahead and believe whatever you want to, this is what I believe.

I dont believe that there are any mainstream cons out there that believe absolutely zero regulation is the way to go, but as close to zero as humanly possible seems to be what the talking heads on Faux news are always screaming for. 
9/28/2011 11:35 PM
And that seems to be the split.

The Left believes that most of the regulations are important, and the right thinks most of the regulations are not needed.

The left believes that the only thing standing in the way of Western Civililazation is the Federal Government. The Right thinks that the Federal Government is part of the problem.

The left believes that Corporations will take a short term profit over long term growth. The right believes that Corporations will keep America strong if it can because it is good for business.

The left thinks lawsuits save the little guy, the right thinks they screw the little guy.

9/29/2011 3:04 AM
Posted by greeny9 on 9/28/2011 11:22:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/27/2011 2:18:00 PM (view original):
Well, yeah, that too.    If I make hand-carved toys and can make 6 per week but only sell 4-5, I don't really need to hire anyone.  So the "Businesses need to pull their heads out their *** and start hiring people" people don't make much sense.   Maybe the unemployed need to pull their heads out their ***** and start spending money they can't afford to spend. 
One of the many problems I have with corporations is that they have absolutely no moral compass whatsoever.  They have no problem whatsoever in taking credits and tax breaks from a country and the very next day they outsource hundreds of jobs from that countries workforce to some 3rd world country.  They are always doing that sort of thing.

Meanwhile does the prices of their products go down while their costs of doing business goes down?  No way, profit is the only thing that matters to them, people dont at all.  They have no loyalty to us whatsoever, so why should we to them?
I find it funny that people seem to think corporations should care about the well-being of people and create jobs.    Corporations are created to make money.   Even the "green" corporations are designed to make money.   What they do beyond that is secondary.   That moral and ethical compass is for individuals.   The individuals who work at the company("I need you to kills that Senator as he's attempting to pass legislature that will hurt our bottom line"/"No, that's not right") or people who utilize the corporation's product("We only kill the freshest puppies to put in our cat food"/"No, that's not right").   A business has no obligation to you.
9/29/2011 6:59 AM
SOAK EM

SCALP EM

PAYBACKS A *****
9/29/2011 8:07 AM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 9/29/2011 3:04:00 AM (view original):
And that seems to be the split.

The Left believes that most of the regulations are important, and the right thinks most of the regulations are not needed.

The left believes that the only thing standing in the way of Western Civililazation is the Federal Government. The Right thinks that the Federal Government is part of the problem.

The left believes that Corporations will take a short term profit over long term growth. The right believes that Corporations will keep America strong if it can because it is good for business.

The left thinks lawsuits save the little guy, the right thinks they screw the little guy.

I personally dont think that inherently the fed gov is in the way of western civilization.  It just happens that way because of the inherent flaws in the system.

Corporations have shown threw their actions that short term profits is all they care about.  What do you think happened with the '08 debacle?  those sub prime  mortgages were obviously going to blow up at some point.  The people that could afford the sub primes many of whom couldnt afford the mortgage when the mortgages go back to regular rates.  But those corps underwriting those contracts had to have known that shouldnt they?  And yet they did them for the short term profit.

I think that lawsuits are a way of keeping corporations honest.  If they knowingly do something against the law why shouldnt they receive a suit?
9/29/2011 9:24 AM
Why shouldn't a corporation chase profits even if they are short-term?   Unless they're breaking a serious law, they aren't going to do jail time or ruin their reputation.   So, when that business blows up, they move on. 

Again, it comes back to personal responsibility.   Don't like the way a company is doing business?  Don't do business with them.  And sure as hell don't work for them.   The people have the power.  They just don't use it.
9/29/2011 9:34 AM
◂ Prev 1...14|15|16|17|18 Next ▸
What is the proper role of government in the US? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.