Quote: Originally posted by hackerhog on 1/05/2010

Quote: Originally posted by kmasonbx on 1/02/2010I've played the zone a fair amount, and I alternate btwn the 3/2 and 2/3, it really depends on my team makeup and the team I'm playing. If I have a stud SF who can rebound than playing the 3-2 for some games is more likely, if the SF I have either isn't very fast or lacks rebounding I will run a + 2/3 against a good 3 point shooting instead of a 3/2.

When I first read that, my thinking was "Do you have that backwards?" But I see your logic now. I have a stud SF on my D2 team that can rebound and is fast. So you're saying I should try the 3-2? Even better, my PF and C can rebound and are excellent shot blockers. Hmmmmmm.

Hey hacker, how ya been?

I think a lot of rebounding has to do with being in position. By playing 3-2 instead of 2-3 I think you're taking your SF out of good rebounding position. I'm not sure if he would do as well.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but in 3-2 the offside wing will come to the elbow, right? In 2-3 the offside guy will come to the block, which is better rebounding position, IMO.

I'm sure the game doesn't think of it that exact way but it should account for it somehow.