What about that Casares at SF and Wedloski at SG, if you have to start Casares?

if you want to break a promise you would just lose 1/2 letter grade from my experience (A+ to A). (if you want to break your promise to start a player). You may also be able to play with him a little bit - bench him for big games and then bring him back to starting after he complains. I haven't done that before (broken promises to start players)

I cut a player once and was back to A+ after one season at A... and no other broken promises. that is the last time I'll ever take a player with a 6 WE!

Interesting thought on the zone. never thought of it that way....

Ya I am not too worried about it, I really only have 1 game that I would even consider to be on edge. Who knows what will happen but I was expecting a .500 year this year with no post season so right now its all icing on the cake.

When post season comes though I will probably bench him for a more reliable starting lineup.

Still. I woudl stick, if you are starting him, Casares at SFm Wed at PG and slide the guy you had at PG the last game over to SG.

Ya I slid everyone around to what your talking about. I am going to stick with it until the playoffs and then depending on how the Frosh does I might plop my Junior SF into the SF place instead for the post season. Gotta see how the season turns out first though.

Thanks everyone though for your thoughts! Its good to get another view on things from more experienced or even people with a different view from no being experienced, always need another look sometimes.

INcidentally, try putting Cas at Fairly fresh and on the foul settings , 'Less aggressive' and back him up with Cloutier as his backup set to 'getting tired' and 'more aggressive' - hopefully that woudl mean that while Cas is technically starting, Cloutier might get more minutes.

I see a_b just pointed out what I was going to suggest......since you have to start Cas, definitely put him at FF and his backup at GT on the fatigue settings.....