Y’all were right Topic

mmt0315
Posts: 450 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 323 4 7
Prospect
Funny, you are quoting me as calling people "insane" I dont think Ive ever said that, if anything Ive said the point swings OR game results are insane. Ive also said I dont see how people cant see this. The Big East Tark is a great example, Georgetown, the preseason #1 who has 770+ rating, 79team ATH 71 team SP and 86 DEF should not be beating some top 25 teams by over 30 while losing to others by 50...these types of swings (which are occuring to every team in the Big East, Tark - are "insane" "absurd" or simply another example of the new engine sucking).

Again, as to no belabor the point, feel free to reread my post above on my thoughts re: posting on forums.

I simply dont see the point of your comment sounds like gibberish honestly.

Yes, some people are apologists, and Im not the only one who seems to think that. Hugh being the biggest one, is it his right to do so, sure. Does he lose credibility when he is trying to justify the functioning of the new engine by justifying Rutgers beating Gtown 50...yup as well...Do, I care enough to offer suggestions, help, etc...not really as it falls on deaf ears...Instead...I exercise my right to ***** and complain.
6/7/2010 1:17 PM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
282 1
Pro
Oh, just their explainations are "Insane' and they are 'blind apologists' who lose all credibility'

Once you obey your own standards, I'll take them seriously.

And also. . . he said the fifty point margin was too big, unless you don't have much reading comprehension. Explaining isn't the same as justifying.

6/7/2010 1:22 PM
mmt0315
Posts: 450 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 323 4 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 6/07/2010
Oh, just their explainations are "Insane' and they are 'blind apologists' who lose all credibility' Good lord wanna talk about reading comprehension please show me, where I said someone or their explanation was insane, I said the large point swings are insane.

Once you obey your own standards, I'll take them seriously. WTF are you talking about, what standards. What exactly is your point. Are you having a conversation with yourself? I was not trying to have a conversation with you, I wasnt trying to help the game, or provide an explanation or any of those other things you seem to think are the only circumstances under which someone can post. I WAS COMPLAINING ABOUT WHAT I BELIEVE IS NOW A CRAP PRODUCT...You decided to post, basically, complaining about me complaining, which I found hysterical as it adds nothing which was your original point about me...There is nothing beyond that...I really dont see why you are trying to pick an argument or drag me into a conversation Im not trying to have...

And also. . . he said the fifty point margin was too big, unless you don't have much reading comprehension. Explaining isn't the same as justifying.



6/7/2010 1:46 PM
mccabemi
Posts: 65 (0)
Hall of Famer
45
Prospect
MMT is not emotionally well...
6/7/2010 1:52 PM
a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 667 3
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 6/07/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 6/07/2010

And as long as you use the term "Blindly defend' for anyone who doesn't agree with you in any way on anything. . .



I dont know where I ever said this...there are those that blindly defend (see some of the insane explanations in this thread and others) and there are those that provide points that have a basis in something tangible which I might not agree with said explanation of conclusion of the breakdown of the data. Learn the difference chief.


That ISN'T calling them insane?
6/7/2010 1:53 PM
dacj501
Posts: 4779 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 305
Pro
I find that the best way to avoid having an unwanted conversation is not to engage in one
6/7/2010 1:54 PM
mmt0315
Posts: 450 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 323 4 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By mccabemi on 6/07/2010MMT is not emotionally well...
lol...Youve been quiet lately!
6/7/2010 2:26 PM
mmt0315
Posts: 450 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 323 4 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By a_in_the_b on 6/07/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By mmt0315 on 6/07/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By arssanguinus on 6/07/2010

And as long as you use the term "Blindly defend' for anyone who doesn't agree with you in any way on anything. . .



I dont know where I ever said this...there are those that blindly defend (see some of the insane explanations in this thread and others) and there are those that provide points that have a basis in something tangible which I might not agree with said explanation of conclusion of the breakdown of the data. Learn the difference chief.


That ISN'T calling them insane?

I stand corrected; although that aside still not sure what his original point was...
6/7/2010 2:28 PM
kannc6
Posts: 64 (0)
Hall of Famer
112 25
Prospect
Attack MMT all you want for his choice of verbiage, but he is essentially on point. This release has been an unmitigated disaster. To argue otherwise is to bark at the moon.

6/7/2010 2:38 PM
◂ Prev 12
Y’all were right Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.