Projection report doesn't equal NT seed.  I'm 20th on the report and got a 6 seed.  Just because Arizona is currently 4th on the report doesn't mean they will get a 1 seed.  How about we wait until the end of the season before complaining about what seed a team receives.

The question we should ask (if we're striving for some realism here) is.............are these results noticably more flawed than RL NT results?

There's no perfect formula - and there's often debate after projections, or after seeds are announced in RL. 

If the results look fairly realistic, I'm not bothered. There doesn't seem to be any ridiculous order to the projections....just a few debatable positions regarding similar teams. 

Posted by aporter on 12/10/2011 11:27:00 PM (view original):
Projection report doesn't equal NT seed.  I'm 20th on the report and got a 6 seed.  Just because Arizona is currently 4th on the report doesn't mean they will get a 1 seed.  How about we wait until the end of the season before complaining about what seed a team receives.

ap, that's interesting. I wonder if you could've been slid down just a spot to avoid a conference matchup or something like that?