Player advice. Topic

"Range is more important than fielding %.  Especially at 2B, CF, SS , 3B, 1B...hell all positions . "

I don't think that is true at all.  Or at the bare minimum misleading.
1/18/2012 9:35 AM

I'd like to see some statistical research, but if all other things being equal I'd take a C+/A+ player over a A+/C+ player any time.  You can't field it if you can't get there.
1/18/2012 8:15 PM
Posted by skinndogg on 1/18/2012 8:15:00 PM (view original):

I'd like to see some statistical research, but if all other things being equal I'd take a C+/A+ player over a A+/C+ player any time.  You can't field it if you can't get there.
Generally speaking, I'd rather have the A+/C+ at C, SS, 3B and I'd rather have the C+/A+ at 1B, 2B and the OF.
1/18/2012 9:44 PM
You're discussing this as though the fielders were the same in all other respects. There are many attributes that can make an A/C fielder more desirable than a C+/A+ player for a particular team. You can say "all else being equal," but all else is never equal.
1/18/2012 10:01 PM
As for middle infielders, I'll take the A+/C+ any day because (1) range costs too much; and (2) a C+ SS will have a ton of errors.  Besides, I generally go with D- range infielders anyway and it works fine for me. 
1/18/2012 11:08 PM
◂ Prev 12
Player advice. Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.