Posted by Trentonjoe on 5/29/2013 10:22:00 AM (view original):
Posted by angmar on 5/29/2013 2:29:00 AM (view original):
At this point, it kind of looks like Steinnavy, Hughes, and Nacho on one side and everyone else on the other. Weena summed it up well in his post above.
I am on the bad guys side too. Seble's satatement makes sense to me.
i wouldnt call it the bad guys side. i think actually at least 25% of users and maybe even 50% or more, would *prefer* people not to have multiple teams in a world. but thats just a preference. we are here in a situation now where good upstanding coaches ended up on the wrong side of the line in the sand, seble even admits he didnt come close to realizing how many people this affected. so the real question is, what now? some people are claiming the guys who just did nothing are totally to blame and are cheaters. i think you can be against multiple teams without taking that view. some people are against multiple teams but think the responsibility falls on seble and the site staff to work with people to ensure a graceful transition, instead of just going (through a low profile CC post), rules changed. thats it, nothing else. i think someone can be against multiple teams and still recognize seble and the system failed, leaving good people in a bad spot. so i dont think its really being against multiple teams that people are reacting so violently against. its this black and white theory than anyone with multiple teams must be a horrible person and nothing should be done to help any of them, and thats all there is to it.