Highest Overall Rating at D3 Topic

ermackey
Posts: 849 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 214 383 4
Prospect
Posted by gillispie1 on 12/5/2015 12:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/4/2015 2:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/3/2015 8:44:00 PM (view original):
HIghest I've seen
Only 16 PPG???

WHAAAA?
that guy is really not that great, overall is inflated by the bottom ratings. the guy's 2pt abilities and 3pt abilities are not really impressive. hes good, ofc, but i dont look at that guy at 16ppg and think they are out of line at all... 
I strongly disagree. He has over an 80 PER and above 60 BH with a 56 SPD as a DIII SF. Even at DII, this is pretty good. Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI.

I would set him at +1 on the PER and sink it all day. He will score at least 33% of his shots and draw fouls against the other team all day. His DEF is also high enough that you do not really have to worry about foul issues on defense interfering with his offensive production.
12/7/2015 11:53 AM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
Posted by ermackey on 12/7/2015 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 12/5/2015 12:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/4/2015 2:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/3/2015 8:44:00 PM (view original):
HIghest I've seen
Only 16 PPG???

WHAAAA?
that guy is really not that great, overall is inflated by the bottom ratings. the guy's 2pt abilities and 3pt abilities are not really impressive. hes good, ofc, but i dont look at that guy at 16ppg and think they are out of line at all... 
I strongly disagree. He has over an 80 PER and above 60 BH with a 56 SPD as a DIII SF. Even at DII, this is pretty good. Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI.

I would set him at +1 on the PER and sink it all day. He will score at least 33% of his shots and draw fouls against the other team all day. His DEF is also high enough that you do not really have to worry about foul issues on defense interfering with his offensive production.
He wouldn't start on a good mid-major at D1 lol.  Maybe if he was at least 65 ath/spd he'd be an okay backup.  He still wouldn't even be a top 25 player at D2
12/7/2015 2:07 PM
pepwaves
Posts: 596 (0)
Hall of Famer
120
Rookie
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/7/2015 2:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/7/2015 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 12/5/2015 12:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/4/2015 2:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/3/2015 8:44:00 PM (view original):
HIghest I've seen
Only 16 PPG???

WHAAAA?
that guy is really not that great, overall is inflated by the bottom ratings. the guy's 2pt abilities and 3pt abilities are not really impressive. hes good, ofc, but i dont look at that guy at 16ppg and think they are out of line at all... 
I strongly disagree. He has over an 80 PER and above 60 BH with a 56 SPD as a DIII SF. Even at DII, this is pretty good. Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI.

I would set him at +1 on the PER and sink it all day. He will score at least 33% of his shots and draw fouls against the other team all day. His DEF is also high enough that you do not really have to worry about foul issues on defense interfering with his offensive production.
He wouldn't start on a good mid-major at D1 lol.  Maybe if he was at least 65 ath/spd he'd be an okay backup.  He still wouldn't even be a top 25 player at D2
Perhaps ermackey meant he would start on many SIM AI D1 mid-majors?  That could be true.  If he meant he'd start on good mid-majors run by human coaches, then it was one of the more ridiculous claims I've seen posted on this forum.  The player in question is a good D3 player, but he would be a bad D1 player.  That ATH/SPD/DEF combo isn't even that good for D2.  I wouldn't be upset if I had to start him on my Dominican squad, but I'd be looking to improve upon him.  For a D3 player, he's definitely good...but far from great. 

This is all not intended to be a knock whatsoever on millwood, because he recruited a very good D3 player.  But, some around here are getting too wrapped up in OVR ratings.


12/7/2015 2:42 PM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
An overall rating which is also heavily inflated by worth ethic, stamina, and durability.
12/7/2015 3:37 PM
mrg1037
Posts: 171 (0)
Hall of Famer
81
Prospect
Posted by jsajsa on 12/3/2015 10:00:00 PM (view original):
Highest was a guy in the 850s I believe. mrg1037 had him. Chad Brown at Martin Luther in Naismith.
Yea, I have not seen anyone higher than Chad Brown. I looked up his final ratings, he ended at 844 overall:

ATH 76
SPD 72
REB 26
DEF 80
BLK 8
LP 76
PER 99
BH 82
PAS 75
WE 87
STA 82
DUR 71
FT C+

His backcourt mate was Carl Vasbinder, overall 748:

ATH 70
SPD 81
REB 23
DEF 60
BLK 9
LP 43
PER 93
BH 82
PAS 75
WE 87
ST 92
DUR 71
FT B

The two best D3 players I ever had, and they were in the same class. They won three straight championships.
12/7/2015 5:34 PM
Benis
Posts: 7256 (0)
Hall of Famer
266
Prospect
Posted by ermackey on 12/7/2015 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 12/5/2015 12:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/4/2015 2:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/3/2015 8:44:00 PM (view original):
HIghest I've seen
Only 16 PPG???

WHAAAA?
that guy is really not that great, overall is inflated by the bottom ratings. the guy's 2pt abilities and 3pt abilities are not really impressive. hes good, ofc, but i dont look at that guy at 16ppg and think they are out of line at all... 
I strongly disagree. He has over an 80 PER and above 60 BH with a 56 SPD as a DIII SF. Even at DII, this is pretty good. Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI.

I would set him at +1 on the PER and sink it all day. He will score at least 33% of his shots and draw fouls against the other team all day. His DEF is also high enough that you do not really have to worry about foul issues on defense interfering with his offensive production.
SF with over 80 PER, 56 SPD and 60 BH?? You mean like this guy?!

https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=3090125


With potentials... he'll max out PER and still blue in BH and LP. He was awful last season but is doing well so far. Although having trouble getting him to shoot the ball more. I would be VERY happy with 16 ppg and wouldn't expect anything more than that out of this guy.

http://imgur.com/IFe6a3t



12/7/2015 5:46 PM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
The only problem is 36 ath and 56 spd really hurts him :(
12/7/2015 6:09 PM
Benis
Posts: 7256 (0)
Hall of Famer
266
Prospect
Harris is 62 spd. Should end up at 70. But yeah ath is def low
12/7/2015 6:11 PM
ermackey
Posts: 849 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 214 383 4
Prospect
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/7/2015 2:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/7/2015 11:53:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gillispie1 on 12/5/2015 12:26:00 AM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/4/2015 2:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/3/2015 8:44:00 PM (view original):
HIghest I've seen
Only 16 PPG???

WHAAAA?
that guy is really not that great, overall is inflated by the bottom ratings. the guy's 2pt abilities and 3pt abilities are not really impressive. hes good, ofc, but i dont look at that guy at 16ppg and think they are out of line at all... 
I strongly disagree. He has over an 80 PER and above 60 BH with a 56 SPD as a DIII SF. Even at DII, this is pretty good. Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI.

I would set him at +1 on the PER and sink it all day. He will score at least 33% of his shots and draw fouls against the other team all day. His DEF is also high enough that you do not really have to worry about foul issues on defense interfering with his offensive production.
He wouldn't start on a good mid-major at D1 lol.  Maybe if he was at least 65 ath/spd he'd be an okay backup.  He still wouldn't even be a top 25 player at D2
I meant what I said. He "would start on many mid-majors at DI."

I did not say he would start on most human owned mid majors.
I did not say he would start on most human teams.
I did not say that he would start at most A+ schools.

What I wrote is true. going beyond that is your doing, not mine. Please stick to what is said and not what you infer. It makes your reading skills look stronger to stick to the written word.
12/8/2015 12:38 PM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
The don't write such dumbly open ended statements.(see i can add in some unnecessary and useless insults for no reason too)

Your statement was bad, the reason he'd start on so many mid majors is because nearly every mid major is garbage besides the few teams coached by the actual good coaches.

Don't go around saying he'd start on mid majors(or leaving it open to be interpreted that way) and lead someone to believe that because it's absolutely false, we don't give a dang what sim teams do because they are garbage.
12/8/2015 1:51 PM
ermackey
Posts: 849 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 214 383 4
Prospect
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 1:52:00 PM (view original):
The don't write such dumbly open ended statements.(see i can add in some unnecessary and useless insults for no reason too)

Your statement was bad, the reason he'd start on so many mid majors is because nearly every mid major is garbage besides the few teams coached by the actual good coaches.

Don't go around saying he'd start on mid majors(or leaving it open to be interpreted that way) and lead someone to believe that because it's absolutely false, we don't give a dang what sim teams do because they are garbage.
Once again, you are changing my quote. I said, "Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI." I did not say "most." I did not say "so many" as you accuse.

I see you are college aged. I hope you are not skipping your College English course to play this game. You really need to attend that course.

This player would start on many D-1 mid-majors. Probably around half of the SIM Mid-majors would use him as a starter at this point. I hope the clarification is enough to satisfy the reading comprehension of the child.
12/8/2015 3:43 PM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
Posted by ermackey on 12/8/2015 3:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 1:52:00 PM (view original):
The don't write such dumbly open ended statements.(see i can add in some unnecessary and useless insults for no reason too)

Your statement was bad, the reason he'd start on so many mid majors is because nearly every mid major is garbage besides the few teams coached by the actual good coaches.

Don't go around saying he'd start on mid majors(or leaving it open to be interpreted that way) and lead someone to believe that because it's absolutely false, we don't give a dang what sim teams do because they are garbage.
Once again, you are changing my quote. I said, "Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI." I did not say "most." I did not say "so many" as you accuse.

I see you are college aged. I hope you are not skipping your College English course to play this game. You really need to attend that course.

This player would start on many D-1 mid-majors. Probably around half of the SIM Mid-majors would use him as a starter at this point. I hope the clarification is enough to satisfy the reading comprehension of the child.

Yes because "so many" and "many" are vastly different and completely change the entire meaning of what you said.

I'm not sure what your homework for ******* 101 is, but you seem to be doing a good job. I'd give an B+ for effort and about a C for quality, nacho was more fun to argue with and had better quips.

And change my quote from "so many" to "many" and the exact statement applies, he is a **** player and a D1 mid major coach who recruited him doesn't know what they are doing unless he is a juco/transfer.

I'm glad you think he can start on "many" mid majors, but he sure as hell isn't starting on anything close to a good mid-major, and isn't even sniffing mine.

12/8/2015 4:05 PM
ermackey
Posts: 849 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 214 383 4
Prospect
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 4:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/8/2015 3:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 1:52:00 PM (view original):
The don't write such dumbly open ended statements.(see i can add in some unnecessary and useless insults for no reason too)

Your statement was bad, the reason he'd start on so many mid majors is because nearly every mid major is garbage besides the few teams coached by the actual good coaches.

Don't go around saying he'd start on mid majors(or leaving it open to be interpreted that way) and lead someone to believe that because it's absolutely false, we don't give a dang what sim teams do because they are garbage.
Once again, you are changing my quote. I said, "Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI." I did not say "most." I did not say "so many" as you accuse.

I see you are college aged. I hope you are not skipping your College English course to play this game. You really need to attend that course.

This player would start on many D-1 mid-majors. Probably around half of the SIM Mid-majors would use him as a starter at this point. I hope the clarification is enough to satisfy the reading comprehension of the child.

Yes because "so many" and "many" are vastly different and completely change the entire meaning of what you said.

I'm not sure what your homework for ******* 101 is, but you seem to be doing a good job. I'd give an B+ for effort and about a C for quality, nacho was more fun to argue with and had better quips.

And change my quote from "so many" to "many" and the exact statement applies, he is a **** player and a D1 mid major coach who recruited him doesn't know what they are doing unless he is a juco/transfer.

I'm glad you think he can start on "many" mid majors, but he sure as hell isn't starting on anything close to a good mid-major, and isn't even sniffing mine.

And you would have a point if your ramblings reflected what typed words actually said.

When you make a mistake and misquote or misapply someone's words, the intelligent and courteous thing to do is to say, "my mistake" and move on.
12/8/2015 4:34 PM
ermackey
Posts: 849 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 214 383 4
Prospect
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 4:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ermackey on 12/8/2015 3:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 12/8/2015 1:52:00 PM (view original):
The don't write such dumbly open ended statements.(see i can add in some unnecessary and useless insults for no reason too)

Your statement was bad, the reason he'd start on so many mid majors is because nearly every mid major is garbage besides the few teams coached by the actual good coaches.

Don't go around saying he'd start on mid majors(or leaving it open to be interpreted that way) and lead someone to believe that because it's absolutely false, we don't give a dang what sim teams do because they are garbage.
Once again, you are changing my quote. I said, "Heck, that would start on many mid-majors at DI." I did not say "most." I did not say "so many" as you accuse.

I see you are college aged. I hope you are not skipping your College English course to play this game. You really need to attend that course.

This player would start on many D-1 mid-majors. Probably around half of the SIM Mid-majors would use him as a starter at this point. I hope the clarification is enough to satisfy the reading comprehension of the child.

Yes because "so many" and "many" are vastly different and completely change the entire meaning of what you said.

I'm not sure what your homework for ******* 101 is, but you seem to be doing a good job. I'd give an B+ for effort and about a C for quality, nacho was more fun to argue with and had better quips.

And change my quote from "so many" to "many" and the exact statement applies, he is a **** player and a D1 mid major coach who recruited him doesn't know what they are doing unless he is a juco/transfer.

I'm glad you think he can start on "many" mid majors, but he sure as hell isn't starting on anything close to a good mid-major, and isn't even sniffing mine.

Blocked because he is basically worthless.
12/8/2015 4:36 PM
the0nlyis
Posts: 2686 (0)
Hall of Famer
295 6
Prospect
my ramblings were more than just insulting the intelligence of the other person.

misquoting "so many" and "many" is nothing, thats just you being an *******, you're wrong anyways so I'll expect my apology in your next post.
12/8/2015 4:36 PM
◂ Prev 123 Next ▸
Highest Overall Rating at D3 Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.