Posted by topdogggbm on 5/8/2020 4:19:00 AM (view original):
Posted by jimmychino on 5/7/2020 5:43:00 PM (view original):
I think everyone is seriously undervaluing promises.
I was on a recruit once that did not have a playing time preference.
He was a top 10 stud.
I pumped in 1000 AP and a scholarship offer, was only at Low versus another school at Very High.
I was A+ prestige, the other school A-. Preferences were basically even.
A promised start and 25 minutes got me from Low to Very High in one cycle. Other school still at Very High.
the subsequent 20 HV and campus knocked the other team down to moderate.
I would guess 25 minutes and a start is equal to 15 HV or so.
I agree with the fact that we're undervaluing promises in this thread. But I'd say 25 minutes and a start is equal to about 10 HV at its peak. And not 15 HV. But I do feel it's being undervalued here
I shall convert everything to home visits.
I believe 50 AP equals a home visit.
i had 1000 AP and a scholarship = the equivalent of roughly 22 home visits.
I was only at low interest, so my estimate is, I was at best, around 40 percent of the leader’s recruiting effort.
assuming you need to get to about 85 percent of the leaders effort to reach very high, I would propose equation.
22/x = .4
x=55
.85x55= 46.75
46.75-22= 24.75
24.75 home visits is the amount of recruiting effort needed to achieve very high.
so in my own example, the 25 minutes and the start was equal to roughly 25 home visits, or, more value than 1000 AP and a scholarship offer.
I am sure some of my assumptions are wrong, but not THAT wrong.
Can anyone point out where I went wrong?