i agree on the lockhart thing, more or less. i only left him out of that long post to keep down on the noise - it was long enough as it was! which really wasn't my intention. that kind of stepwise look at the rotation is something i do all the time, and it seems simple, but ended up being quite wordy - i just don't know how else to inspect this stuff, once the simple version of the theory has been laid out (level the fatigue, and fairly fresh leading to better 3 man rotation in this case). its good to think through the rotation stepwise for you own teams, or at least watch the pbp and make sure it seems good (most pbp info is useless, but the way you can watch the rotation is gold)
so i would go with
PF - campbell / newmann / rachael / lockhart
the blank in PF2 was included for illustrative purposes, its ok to take it out. its not needed to prefer campbell / newmann, which will still happen in the PF lineup above, due to the way the tie breaker works (highest player in the left most column), but i was trying to simplify to avoid unreasonable length... newmann / rachael would sum to 3 with the above, tying with campbell / newmann, but campbell / newmann is still favored because in the left most column, pf, campbell is highest.
anyway, i disagree on the fatigue problem comment shoe made, the rotation looks good to me. looking at that elon game, rachael got a bit into the yellow late in the 2nd half. a bit of yellow, especially late, is not a big deal. and when you have a starter on getting tired, the dude is literally playing into the yellow before he subs out every single time. so i can't really see that as an argument for a getting tired starter.
9/17/2021 10:48 AM (edited)