Posted by salag on 6/24/2021 10:52:00 AM (view original):
Posted by topdogggbm on 6/23/2021 12:19:00 PM (view original):
As initially proposed, Chris and Adam and everyone else involved KNOW it is not an ideal setup. They've seen the push back from the community. They're reading each and every idea they are presented here. They're evaluating all areas.
Nothing will take place until they announce a second, more well thought out set of criteria. We all need to relax and wait until the next set of firing guidelines get presented....... and THEN we can flip out some more Haha
Was it said that they are working on a second set of firing guidelines? I must have missed it?
Nothing official. Adam told me, via CS ticket response, that they intend to have a grace period for coaches taking over new programs, but did not elaborate. But he also expressed confidence that the requirements were “achievable” according to the data, though this was before most of this thread (and others) developed. So it’s still very much a mixed bag, where it stands right now, IMO.