Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 1/31/2010
You didn't really answer the questions.
Nonetheless, what, exactly, should WifS' policy be? If x-number of owners say "Damn, that world is f'd up" just close it down? Close down worlds with x-number of openings?
Provide a solution, or at least a suggestion, instead of ******** about what others are doing.
As opposed to some I had not been so pretentious as to outline a solution for wifs - only to point out what the users should
not be trying to solve a problem that belongs to wifs.
However, if you want a solution here is a possible outline
(1) No public leagues - all leagues to have commissioners who are responsible to wifs for maintaining balance in the league (in theory like it should work in MLB). The commish will receive a free season for each year he is the commish that league. Any league that loses it commissioner has one appointed by wifs with the advice and consent of the league. If in wifs opinion the league becomes unbalanced wifs will remove the commissioner and replace with the commish with who ever they see fit. The commish will retain the power to remove owners at rollover.
(2) All leagues not filling in one week must consider newbie owners and will be listed as available leagues - but admittance will be through the commissioner like a private league. The commish must maintain a 33% admittance rate for newbies.
(3) Wifs will stop playing games with alias - they can tell if 2 "owners" are likely the same person and have choosen not to act on most of these - at a minimum they should be notifying the commissioners of each league of potential risks.
In short all leagues have commissioner, all commissioers are "paid" and act as wifs agents to keep their leagues clean, failed commissioners are removed, and wifs more actively monitors for conflicts and alias via discussions with its agent/commissioners.