Posted by girt25 on 2/1/2012 11:12:00 PM (view original):
Posted by arssanguinus on 2/1/2012 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Base the playing time they expect on a combination of rating and class year rather than just rating. If they have ratings commensurate with a division one sophomore in their freshman year, they are going to expect sophomore minutes.
That assumes that they could craft a system that could properly recognize that ... and the notion they could so is dubious at best.
Again, I agree that promises should be worth more. And I'd be OK with a personality thing where some recruits really want minutes, etc**. But if this is done, you need to make freshmen have the ability to be more impactful.
**That said, I think it should be a recruiting preference. I don't think, for instance, that there should be recruits who literally won't sign with you unless they're starting. I think that would be ridiculous. And if they even entertained something close to that, you have to make them real impact players and severely increase IQ.
I don't think it should be common, but I have no problem if a small percentage of elite recruits would require a promised start in order to sign with a school. If that means that a 5 star drops to a B prestige BCS teams or mid-majors, so be it. That could be part of adding more texture and layers to recruiting - guys require a start, guys require x minutes, guys who really want to play in the tournament and would only sign with schools that went to the NT last season, guys who take education seriously and only want to sign with a school where the bbteam has a GPA > 3.0 (I would make it determined on the kids there, rather than simply on reputation, although as the coach at Duke and Georgetown the reputation would work better for me), etc.
I also have no problem that elite recruits generally assume they would be a rotation player, and expect say, 8+ minutes per game. To piggyback on the original player discussed in this thread, UNC's Kevin Robinson, I do think it is absolutely ridiculous that ANY player, whether it is a 5-star signing with an A+ elite or a 380 overall signing at a C prestige DIII school, is fine that 14 games into the season they haven't seen the court at all.
Let's not overstate the dangers of playing or even starting elite freshman. Yeah, they can't step in a be a Durant or Carmelo - but the way HD is set up there aren't too many Durants or Carmelos anyway. You can certainly start a 5-star, have them as your 5th option and still be a NT contender.