My six-month term as Baseball Czar Topic

www.baseballprospectus.com/compensation/cots/   pinotfan, im using the team salary ranks from this site.
8/3/2015 7:33 PM
It's cool, we're close.  It's not like one source had a team at $160mil and another site had it at $40mil!
8/3/2015 8:14 PM
Posted by italyprof on 8/3/2015 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Ok, a lot to digest and reply to. Obviously the Baseball Liberation Front opposes the re-privatization policies and the other money-economic stuff advocated by the Usurper pinotfan and his fellow coup planners. 

BUT...there is some intriguing stuff here - yes, return to "Take me out to the ballgame" please. Havana v. Miami - he may have me here (you KNOW who I am rooting for in that one - and my dad lives in Miami, so that is two strikes against that place). 

The trading deadline stuff is good, and the compromise on domes/natural grass is good. We agree on interleague play. I will rethink the whole international players thing, which was not intended as a national diatribe on my part (I am NOT voting for Trump dudes), but rather a recognition that many players from overseas are recruiting en masse - leaving 90% to rot after being exploited - only to undermine US level player costs and leading inadvertently to the dearth of African American players in MLB. 

I have no idea why contrarian23 who is normally a sane person insists on PEDs - would this apply to boxing as well?  And when the first 170 mph fastball breaks the first batting helmet in half and kills someone? I am agin' cheating. Just don't see the justification for it. pinotfan's suggested separation of HOF and MLB records is interesting, will think about it, not happy with records that can never be broken unless we let cyborgs play in the 22nd century, but then again the records for most innings pitched, and for batting average in a single season are unbreakable too, so maybe I should just let it go. But want to think about it. 

I understand that pinotfan does not understand how limiting options can increase strategy, but imagine a game - any game, chess, checkers, hopscotch, gladiator games, whatever, without rules (limits on what you can do) - it is not a game, just stupid. That is what anarchy, oh, I mean the market, is. Unless we set rules. 

Otherwise your view of freedom is: "I want material forces, out of my control entirely, which millions of years of my ancestors' efforts sought to overcome to provide me with more control over my destiny, to have free reign and to completely dominate my destiny, rather that have it be the result of my own activity and efforts, my reason and the reason and efforts collectively of myself and my fellow citizens, and fellow humans. I call this slavery to material forces, freedom."
One of the things I love about baseball is how it doesn’t change. Basically, the game is the same in 2015 as it was in 1915. That’s something that frustrates me about football: the rules change constantly. The definitions of offensive holding, allowable defensive contact with receivers, etc., fundamentally change the game. Of course there needs to be rules, and baseball’s rules work beautifully. Saying that existing rules should not be changed is a far cry from saying there should be no rules (don’t go creating straw men on me, IP). If you notice, none of my proposed changes affect what happens to the play of the game between the lines (excepting, perhaps, the elimination of body armor for batters). My changes are designed for the most part to increase the exposure/popularity of the game, and put more money in the players’ pockets.

And foreign-born players taking slots has nothing to do with why we’re seeing a precipitous decline in African-Americans in MLB. Youth baseball has become a rich person’s playground, with pay-for-play traveling teams starting as early as 8 years old. Many ‘core’ teams play 100-plus games a year; traveling teams rack up hundreds, in some cases thousands, of miles. Elite youth baseball is the province of the wealthy. So, if that’s the case, why so many South and Central Americans? Because along with soccer, baseball is their national pastime as well.  Their organized teams may not play as much as America’s, but the kids are playing just as much outside of organized leagues, plus MLB is heavily invested in developing talent there. 
8/3/2015 8:16 PM
I see a lot of good points all around. Perhaps I should write my own vision as well. But rather than clutter things my doing so as a fix of a fix, I would probably just start fresh, since otherwise I suspect there will be widespread confusion.

Question is does anyone care?
8/4/2015 9:43 PM (edited)
Yes, I would like to see what you have to bring to the table. 
8/5/2015 6:00 AM

So I’ve accepted the position as Commissioner of Major League Baseball (MLB), as well as the position of President of the International Baseball Federation (IBAF). Being able to run both organizations will allow for a much smoother running of the baseball community and global growth of the game.

 

Let’s look first at a couple of changes I’ll introduce as commissioner of MLB.

First (Expansion), we’re going to add 2 teams to the major leagues, allowing both leagues to have 16 teams and bringing things back into balance. We will use a structure similar to the NFL.

NL West: San Diego, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Colorado

NL North: St. Louis, Chicago Cubs, Cincinnati, Milwaukee

NL South: Arizona, Atlanta, Florida, Houston (yes, they’re returning to the NL)

NL East: New York Mets, Philadelphia, Washington, Pittsburgh

AL West: Oakland, Seattle, Anaheim (that’s where it plays), Portland(expansion*)

AL North: Chicago White Sox, Cleveland, Detroit, Minnesota

AL South: Texas, Kansas City, Tampa Bay, New Orleans(expansion*)

AL East: NY Yankees, Boston, Baltimore, Toronto

*this is my first inclination as to where expansion should probably go, it doesn’t necessarily have to be the case – in general, we’re looking for some western site and some southern site. Alternate Western sites: Vancouver, Edmonton, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City, Honolulu, Boise. Alternate Southern sites: Jacksonville, Louisville, Nashville, Memphis, Charlotte, Oklahoma City.

Under this current structure, 6 teams in the AL and NL each shall make the playoffs. The top two teams by record shall have a first-round bye, and each wildcard will play one of the other division winners in a best-of-three playoff, with game 1 at the wildcard site and games 2 and 3 being played at the division winner’s site, with no dedicated travel day between sites. Only second-place teams may be wildcards.

This alignment is useful to contain interleague play to the middle of the season. Each team will play each of their division rivals 18 times, each league opponent 6 times, the same division as your league opponents (ie. AL West vs. NL West) 6 times, and a different division’s opponents (rotating each year) 3 times, for a total of 162 games [(3*18)+(12*6)+(4*6)+(4*3)]

Over the course of some 25 years, we will implement a plan to gradually expand MLB to 40 sites throughout the United States and Canada, with 5 teams in each division. When we are at 36 teams, 18 per league, we’ll expand the playoffs to 8 teams per league, at which time third-place teams will be eligible for wildcard positions and the first round shall become a 5-game series with no byes.

 

Second, (ownership and player salaries) (partial from italyprof), all teams will be jointly purchased by MLB and the municipality for which the team represents. The league and city will work together to maintain an atmosphere of competitiveness and benefit to the cities. If a city determines that it is no longer able to maintain an MLB franchise, then it should look to sell its half of the team back to MLB, which will flip that to a new city for the team to move to as soon as possible.  A city may also diversify the holdings to support the entire region, and is encouraged but not required to do so, as such authorities are difficult to maintain and define.

As such, cities ultimately maintain one-half of the revenue from all local contracts, ticket sales, and other purchases. All national contracts are fully engaged by MLB, and as national contracts tend to be the bulk of the revenue, in practice we will result in many times having similar revenue streams. If a team has a revenue stream significantly higher than the others, ultimately half will go to the League and half will be profit for the city, as the salary caps will be set so that most teams are capable of hitting it. MLB will subsidize teams that are not capable of hitting it. No player may earn more than 1/10 of the salary cap, and all players that play in the majors must earn at least 1/200 of the cap on a pro-rated basis for the number of days on an active MLB roster. If a team uses more than 40 players in a season, they may request cap extensions by the amount needed to spend on each additional player. Teams will be required to spend at least 95% of the cap. Failure to do so will result in all players receiving an equal bonus to their salaries equal to that necessary to have that team reach 95%. No other significant changes will be made to the player earnings structure at the MLB level.

(minor league stuff) All players with minor league contracts will earn a flat rate as dictated by the collective revenue streams of all minor league teams at their level and grade. The minor league system will look similar to the major league system in terms of ownership structure, except MiLB will move around money as needed to ensure all players are earning more or less the same at their level and grade. (Grade: a system used to define the value of a player to his team. This grade is defined by the minor league team’s manager, and must give out seven grade ones, ten grade twos, and eight grade threes. Players with major league contracts fill from grade three, as even though they are technically going to earn more than grade one players, they are paid by the MLB team, not the MiLB team.) Salary structure will vary by revenue, but AAA-1 > AAA-2 > AAA-3 > AA-1 > etc. Injured minor leaguers retain their last grade though they are not using the grade slot from their club. There are no minor league signing bonuses, although contracts may specify grade guarantees for specific results, as long as the team is capable of collectively meeting those guarantees no matter how a team performs.

The Mexican League is kicked out of Minor League Baseball, as are all leagues involving teams outside the US and Canada (or, they must move the teams back into those countries.) The Mexican League needs the freedom to be able to build its caliber, as does the international world in general. This is a move encouraged by IBAF.

Amateur signing bonuses – Through the draft, signing bonuses are set by the round, and are the same for all teams in that round. For international AFAs, the current system will be upheld, except we will not allow teams to go more than ten percent over the international signing bonus cap at all.

 

Third, with normalized relations with Cuba, players now have the ability to transfer between the SNC and MLB. To protect the Cuban league while still allowing transition, we will introduce a posting system similar to the Japanese and Korean leagues. This will take Cuba largely out of amateur international signings, although if the player is around 18 it will still apply.

 

Fourth, a few minor gameplay tweaks.

1) A player that enters the game during a defensive inning (that is, after the first pitch of the defensive inning has been thrown) may not leave the game during that same inning unless: a) the player is injured, in which case they may not participate in the next scheduled contest, or b) the player is a pitcher and the offense has scored at least 2 runs since the pitcher began pitching. Intent: limiting endless one-batter pitching changes, while still allowing strategic decisions and the removal of completely ineffective arms.

2) MLB will adopt the international extra-inning rule. After twelve innings, the last two batters in the batting order shall occupy first and second base to start the inning. Intent: While 16+ inning games sound thrilling to some, in reality most people get tired of them, both player and fan alike, and no one truly wants to stick around to 1AM. You might be saying “yeah, I’m having a great time here”, but we both know you’re thinking “Great Bambino why won’t this game end already?”

3) The flow of the game will not be stopped for potential instant replay issues. If the umpire is ready to begin play and a manager hasn’t asked for a replay yet, he’s waited too long. A manager leaving the dugout has forfeited his opportunity to replay; there will be a signal that can trigger it from the dugout (if all else fails, shout REPLAY from it). Players cannot deliberately delay this, as the twenty second pitch clock will be fully enforced. All calls except balls and strikes can be reviewed as long as the result of the review would not be a live ball.

4) An electronic strike zone will be used at all major league sites. No more of this crap where every umpire’s zone is 3 inches apart from every other’s. If the system breaks during the game, an umpire can make the calls as necessary while waiting for the system to repair, if such repair is possible without delaying the game. Once the system is repaired, the umpire will continue to make calls (or will briefly pause, then resume) so that he has called balls and strikes for the same number of batters for both teams, to prevent a system break from resulting in an unfair advantage. Minor league sites shall be dependent on available funding, but all sites for an entire league (or none) must use the system. MLB shall endeavor to assist in the implementation of these systems when feasible. Systems will be continually assessed for cost-effectiveness. (We will not fall into the same pit that FIFA did, of being locked into a single system that is ridiculously expensive (in their case, for goal-line tech).)

5) A team may only have 25 players active for any individual contest. Games in which more than 25 players are on the “active roster” (ie: during September roster expansion) may still only place 25 players on the lineup card for that game, they simply have more freedom to change the list of 25 on a game-to-game basis.

6) Stolen from pinotfan: No more body armor without legitimate injuries, defensive indifference calls (Why would you be indifferent to a free chance to make an out on the basepaths? As a manager, anyone that’s not the tying run that is running in the 9th is getting screamed at – nothing to gain, everything to lose, once catchers realize this and start throwing. My catcher throws every time even if 1% chance to get – again, nothing to lose), or God Bless America.

7) No more fielder’s choice calls that don’t result in an out. Simplify the scoring; results are either outs or hits. Fielder’s choice is a type of out. If no one was called out that’s either a hit or an error, end of discussion. Throwing to the wrong base is probably an error, unless you couldn’t have gotten the batter out, in which case the result is a hit.

 

Lastly, a fund will be created to internationally grow the game and attempt to create competitive baseball throughout the world. This fund will be managed by IBAF and explained in part two (directly below).

 

That’s all that will immediately, directly impact MLB. Of course I’m also president of IBAF. Let’s get started.

A big portion of the profit that MLB produces is going to straight to IBAF to build the game globally. So we’ll get most of our funding from that.

Also, national federations are going to get much stronger. Overall, the goal is to create an IBAF that is as strong, all-encompassing, and profitable as FIFA, without the corruption and asinine stupidity. That’s a long way off, but we’ll take some baby steps.

 

First, we’ll establish the World Baseball Classic as a major tournament, every 4 years in March. The key point we’re going to make here is that February and March is going to be an international window in which teams will be obligated to permit their players to play on national teams without prejudice. Of course, players still have the freedom to choose whether to play, but players will be earning significant bonuses for playing, especially in the major tournaments. Marketing for these tournaments will be competent and people will watch.

In the year prior to the WBC, continental-level tournaments will set qualification for all teams. If there are a lot of teams in an area, two years prior to the WBC may see lower-ranked teams play in pre-qualification events. All of these events will take place during the international window.

 

Second, let’s create a worldwide Tournament of Champions, for all championship clubs. This tournament will take place in late October and early November. (Phase One will actually run simultaneous with the end of the World Series, although it will generally be day games US time so as not to conflict with the World Series itself.)

Under the current formats, leagues that enter their champions in Phase One: Australian Baseball League, Mexican League, Chinese Professional Baseball League (Taiwan), European Champions League of Baseball. Phase One is a double-elimination tournament at a neutral site in which the top two teams qualify for Phase Two.

Phase Two, beginning a few days after the World Series, will consist of the two teams that qualify out of Phase One, plus the champions of the American League, National League, Nippon Professional Baseball, Korean Baseball Assocation, Serie Nacional de Cuba, and Carribean World Series. (Players that appear on both a Carribean or Cuban roster and an American or National league roster will have a choice to make.) This will be a double-elimination tournament to crown a single Global Champion.

As the games continue to grow and league parity begins to change, the format will be reassessed. More competitive leagues might move up in phase, new leagues that become competitive might be added to Phase One, or the entire format may need changing based on the needs of world baseball as it continues to grow.

 

Third, let’s actually grow the game internationally. Begin investing in baseball academies and local teams not with the sole intention of finding MLB talent, but, as the fund is an IBAF fund, with the intent of improving leagues worldwide. Some of the details of what we will do here are beyond the scope of this page, but the intent is for there to be many competitive leagues around the world. The intent will be to have significant presences with multiple competitive professional leagues on every inhabited continent. We will draw inspiration both from the new setup of MLB and from the styles of sports as played in the regions in question. A brief plan for many different regions is displayed.

Mexico and Central America: Continue to build the strength of the Mexican league through vigorous youth programs and marketing. Create a single Central American Baseball League to encompass the top level of baseball for all seven countries, and work primarily from the ground up to build it slowly.

South America: Create leagues in each of the ten major countries, if they do not already have a league. It is likely that many of these will have to start as amateur leagues while players continue to build. Have most players in amateur leagues have a goal first of getting to Venezuela, Colombia, or Brazil to play, then possibly to Mexico, then the Major Leagues. As baseball grows in interest, the leagues may eventually become professional. The key is simply to play ball and provide an alternative to soccer. Ultimately the individuals of the countries will determine the course of most nations here.

The Caribbean: Create single teams on many different Caribbean islands to form a semi-pro Caribbean-wide summer league. Include a couple of teams from Puerto Rico in this league to encourage competitiveness. Due to excessive discrimination occurring in the DR right now, they shall not be permitted into this league. Once the turmoil settles, Hispaniola-based expansion will be considered. Cuba shall continue to build its own league without regard to the rest of the Caribbean, although if the Caribbean-at-large manages to catch up to Cuba in terms of level of play, a unification attempt might be made.

Europe: Generate a series of regional/national leagues to build up the sport. Regional leagues will be prevalent in most of the continent to begin because baseball will not be significant enough to support an entire country worth of a high-level baseball league. As baseball continues to get better, the regional leagues may split. Champions of all leagues, and possibly other berths based on quality, shall also participate in European Champions League competition, leading to Phase One of the World TOC.

The Middle East and Africa: Create and utilize leagues in countries and groups of countries as deemed feasible. Due to hostile climates, regional instability, and economic troubles, it is recognized that baseball – a sport that is not cheap to get into – may have difficulties. Slow building is key. It might be that expanding international play to the entire year in these areas might also be intelligent.

South Asia: Draw on the parallels to cricket, and recruit players that are struggling to make their leagues. The potential for money-making in cricket is high enough, and the skill set is similar enough, that any progress in here is likely to be painful. As such, this is not really a priority.

Southeast Asia: Build a league to stretch across Southeast Asia, drawing heavily on the already existing Thai federation. Build from the ground in many countries with the intent of creating a competitive league.

East Asia and the Pacific: Many places in this region already have high quality baseball, or at least some presence – continue to build those leagues in their quality, both the already excellent leagues of South Korea and Japan, and the rather lower level leagues of China, Australia, and the Philippines. Expand the Australian league to cover New Zealand and have more teams in general as feasible.

In general, we would like each of these areas, within reason, to have their own championship (or be part of a larger area that has a championship) that would eventually feed into the world’s TOC. (MLB teams will likely always qualify directly for that world TOC.)

 

There is actually one other fairly major thing I would like to do, but I’m not sure which category it goes under (I suppose both, ultimately), and I think there’s actually quite enough to digest here. So that might be a later post.

8/5/2015 9:18 PM (edited)
I think if you want to include a Champions League (or TOC I think you called it) and an international period which sees some use most years, you need to shorten the schedule.  162 games + expanded playoffs + international games + TOC games is just too much.  You're asking for injury problems, especially among the pitchers.  You really need the offseason in baseball.  There's a lot more repetitive motions than most other sports, resulting in substantial strain in localized regions of the body that need time to rest and heal.
8/5/2015 10:04 PM
Posted by dahsdebater on 8/5/2015 10:04:00 PM (view original):
I think if you want to include a Champions League (or TOC I think you called it) and an international period which sees some use most years, you need to shorten the schedule.  162 games + expanded playoffs + international games + TOC games is just too much.  You're asking for injury problems, especially among the pitchers.  You really need the offseason in baseball.  There's a lot more repetitive motions than most other sports, resulting in substantial strain in localized regions of the body that need time to rest and heal.
I would expect pitchers that pitch deep into postseasons to not play internationally next year, especially if it's not the WBC year. Clubs are required to give players the option, I expect pitchers in particular to be smart about it.

Injury risk is roughly the same every day, though, for position players at least. I don't expect position players to be affected much. They'd have no issue playing year-round really. In fact a few sort of do, hence my comment about appearing on both a Caribbean and Major League roster.

And I could potentially see dropping a handful of division games. Maybe go down to 16 per division opponent, that'd put us at 156, or go to 14 and play 150. Overall, Fair point: other leagues don't play quite as long either. It's not a bad thought.


8/5/2015 11:55 PM
Very interesting program. I can go along with it. Can I run the Italy section of the European division of the International ?
8/6/2015 6:44 AM
Posted by italyprof on 8/6/2015 6:44:00 AM (view original):
Very interesting program. I can go along with it. Can I run the Italy section of the European division of the International ?
Sure I guess
8/6/2015 2:57 PM
After having uncleal removed from my office, I looked at the papers he left behind. Allow me to comment.


Expansion. I believe it is better for the long-term growth of the game to expand internationally than domestically, and therefore eschew his domestic expansion plans and adhere to my proposed expansion into Canada, Mexico, and the Caribbean. BTW, I was not proposing adding all the teams at once (not that anyone has said I did; just wanted to clarify); they will be phased in. Alignment, as I said, is open to debate as I agree we need to do something about my proposed AL East. I have been contemplating the playoff/wild card issue, and will address that separately. Also, should uncleal’s proposals ever come to fruition (shudder) I do not agree that only second-place teams should be eligible for the Wild Card. If three teams in the same division finish with over 100 wins while the next best non-division winner has 95 wins, the 100 win team should make the playoffs. Don’t penalize success.


Ownership.  The value of franchises will plummet with public ownership (can you imagine a city paying $2 billion for the Clippers?), so the amount of money flowing to the public (donations, foundations, taxes, etc.) will plummet as well. Also, as government has yet to prove it can run things more efficiently than the private sector can – remember, one of the first things government does when it wants to cut costs is outsource, because the private sector can do things better and cheaper – this will even further reduce the ‘public good’ aspect of uncleal/italyprof’s share-the-wealth proposals.


Player Salaries. I also have never understood the love affair so many people have with limiting player salaries. There’s a story about when Wayne Gretzky was traded to the Kings; the trade was contingent on Gretzky working out a new contract with owner Bruce McNall. They met, and did one of the classic negotiating plays: they each wrote down what they thought the contract should be, and exchanged numbers. Gretzky’s was lower than McNall’s, and the argument began. Gretzky ‘s position was that the Kings couldn’t afford to pay him McNall’s number and still have enough money to be competitive. McNall’s position was that Gretzky wasn’t looking at the big picture, what impact Gretzky would have on the Kings and hockey in general (bringing serious hockey to the West) and that the team would make far, far more money than Gretzky imagined, and with that money they would build a contender. McNall was right on all points.


On the negative side, limiting salaries will result in a talent drain. Most baseball players are ‘all-around athletes’ – they would be successful at other sports as well, not just baseball. Indeed, many have been drafted in multiple sports. Lowering baseball salaries, combined with increasing salaries in every other professional sport, will drive many away from pursuing baseball as a career. I want the best players to play our beloved game, and the uncleal/italyprof model will guarantee that will not happen. We need to attract the best players, not repel them.

Minor Leagues.
 The Minor Leagues stay the same; the same general arguments above apply. I actually am happy uncleal brought up signing bonuses, as they are currently set based on draft position. I would abolish that, allowing teams to offer whatever signing bonuses they want. I would abolish the prohibition on trading draft picks. I would also make the draft a true amateur draft, not limiting it to American players. All world-wide amateurs would be eligible.


Gameplay Tweaks.
 I have already stated my position that the play of the game, the rules, stay the same. I will address the change proposals:
-          Players need to stay in the game for an inning. Hate it, as it limits options. I too get a little tired of one-batter pitchers, but I also believe that is a temporary phenomenon that will soon pass (as will the ridiculous amount of defensive shifts we currently see). Let the game evolve naturally, as it always has. Also, allow me an anecdote. One of the most creative managerial moves I’ve ever seen was by Tommy Lasorda, not one I usually associate with innovation. Valenzuela was on the mound, pitch count was getting up there but not bad and he was pitching well, but coming to bat was a righty Valenzuela had trouble with. Lasorda brought in a righty, and moved Valenzuela to right field! After the batter, Lasorda brought in a new right fielder and returned Valenzuela to the mound. Freakin’ brilliant. And a move we’d never see under uncleal/italyprof.
-          Extra Inning Rules. The number of 13+ inning games is so small a percentage of total games that this tweak is wholly unnecessary. And if a game goes longer, so be it: I’ll guarantee you anyone who sits through a 20-inning game will talk about it for the rest of their lives, and isn’t that what we want?
-          Instant Replay. Not a bad alternative to my proposal, but I think allowing teams the entire time until the resumption of play to make their appeal is too long. What I was trying to avoid with my rule (five seconds after the stoppage of play) was teams looking at their own replays and then appealing. Anybody can second-guess if they have already seen the replay.
-          Electronic Strike Zone. I can be talked into this, as I contemplated it long and hard before my first missive. Personally, I don’t have a problem with umpires having slightly different strike zones as long as each individual umpire is consistent. It’s like knowing the opposing pitcher: ‘Umpire Smith is behind the plate tonight; he calls the low strike.” The thing is, Smith had damn well better call it consistently. I’d like to give K-Zone and the other ball/strike technology a couple more years, then look at the question again. Ultimately, I think that’s the direction to go.
-          ‘Stolen from Pinotfan’. Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.  
-          Change to Fielder’s Choice Scoring. Again, I disagree. By making the choice to go to another base the fielder allowed the batter to reach first when he otherwise would have been out (barring an error). That is an independent action, and should be recorded as such. What happens when the ball goes to a different base is another action independent of the decision to throw to that base, and the results of that decision need to be recorded accurately as well.
-          International Growth. I’m all in favor of international growth; I just disagree with the funding plan. As for the international TOC, I would exclude MLB from it. As is mentioned by uncleal, the international leagues will not be near the talent level that MLB possesses so it would be like having the Patriots play the winner of the European Football League – a blowout, rife with opportunities for injuries. Also, pitchers and catchers currently report about the third week of February and, under the current schedule, Game 7 of the World Series is scheduled for November 4th. Assuming the TOC would last about two weeks (including the off days after the MLB World Series), players will have less than three months off between seasons. This will be death to pitchers and older players, as well as injured players waiting for the offseason to recuperate, rehab, or have surgery. Even younger players need the time to rest after the grind of an MLB season and playoffs, and the health of the players should be of paramount concern.  And do you think there will be any enthusiasm at all for the World Series participants to play against second-tier international players a few days after concluding the emotion-packed Series? All things considered, good luck getting it by the MLBPA.
 
So, now that sanity has returned to the Commissioner’s office, play ball!
8/6/2015 3:11 PM
I just want to point out something at I hope you guys change as your 6 months of baseball Czar. The MLBPA constantly deals away rights of minor league ball players in exchange of getting more rights for the Major Leaguers. Dirk Hayhurst. Former pitcher of the Padres wrote some good articles on it
8/7/2015 1:19 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Separating the minors from the majors removes the vast majority of their funding - and their expenses would go up dramatically.  For example, right now Major League teams draft players who they feel have little or no chance of making the Show, but they need players in their minor league system.  Player research and development costs would then largely accrue to the minor league team if severed from their Major League 'supplier'.

As for the union, MLBPA represents players currently in the majors only.  It might be interesting if players in the minors who are under contract to an MLB team are included in the union (it would definitely change the priorities of the MLBPA), and non-contract players unionize separately.  The two-union concept makes sense to me because upper level players are almost all under MLB contract (AA and AAA), and as those players get called up and sent down frequently you avoid the situation of 'today I'm in one union, tomorrow another, then back to the original one.'  Also, contract players have their MLB teams looking out for them long-term,  Lower level players don't have that, and their concerns are different so a separate union may be more appropriate. 

I don't know, this is just off the top of my mind.  Some of our resident socialists may have better ideas regarding unionization of the minors.
8/7/2015 11:04 AM
Well I don't think we're ever going to agree on the whole issue of public/private ownership splits. And your whole premise is garbage -- in general, every time something gets privatized the service goes down the toilet. 90% of the time it's inherently less efficient because you have to add a profit margin, something is going to give. Privatization works when you need to cover an area that isn't neatly covered by any functioning governmental authority. For instance, waste collection in my area is privatized because companies can cover all of the nebulous area that is "East County" with relative ease, but that's multiple cities and unincorporated areas that can't really be handled by any single government authority well. This is where privatization works. It doesn't work in too many other cases.

On player salaries in general, the point isn't to limit player salaries per se, it's to ensure the competitive nature of the game. Teams that outspend other teams by too much skew the competitiveness. Simple math.

Putting all countries into the draft is a good way to guarantee that those countries rarely if ever have players get into MLB. Scouting internationally is more expensive and teams won't pay for the expense of it if they have to pay players at the same rate. A couple of teams might cover an area but only because of near-exclusivity of being the only ones there.

That Lasorda gambit is already illegal by the current rules of MLB, unless Valenzuela started that inning or finished that inning in RF. "A player may not move between pitcher and a position other than pitcher twice in the same inning."

My only issue with five seconds for replay was that it was too arbitrary. Why not six or four? A chance to think helps too. The point is not to slow the game to "maybe" replay the call. (One can make a similar case for the pitch clock, admittedly, but the timing is fairly long.)

TOC Phase Two is a 6-or-7-day event. Day 1: Round of 8. Day 2: 4 1-loss teams, 4 no-loss teams. Day 3: Elimination games for the 4 one-loss teams (Undefeated teams get a bye). Day 4: 2 1-loss teams, 2 no-loss teams. Day 5: Elimination game for 2 1-loss teams (Undefeated team gets a bye). Day 6: Finals. Day 7: If necessary final (if the 1-loss team won on day 6). (Phase One is similar as a 3-day event as we only need to drop down to two teams, don't need a champion of it)

Baseball is not football. One game: anything can happen. Netherlands has beaten the DR twice in WBC events. The weak leagues have to play Phase One of the TOC. The six teams that go directly to Phase Two are all at least AA-level, except maybe the Caribbean team as those vary wildly from year-to-year (and if you're worried about stability flip it with Mexican League as it is a AA/AAA-level league), and especially given the drain of energy for the MLB teams, they might not automatically win. Can see moving this event to March as well, however, though players on national teams would have hard choices to make some years. Obviously as the leagues around the world continue to grow and adapt the format would be in flux, I just posted the format for what's likely for the current world situation.

Obviously, under my system the issue of minor league unionization isn't really relevant as it's still all controlled from the major league level. However, with international growth players that get too unhappy with the state of their salary at the level they're at might go shopping their talents to another country, which would likely have a similar union structure, but possibly more money as they'd be at that country's top level and directly within their own negotiations.
8/7/2015 8:12 PM
◂ Prev 12345 Next ▸
My six-month term as Baseball Czar Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.