Camps - Hosted, Public - or No Camps Topic

Posted by CoachWard95 on 2/11/2017 12:16:00 PM (view original):
Posted by kashmir75 on 2/11/2017 8:47:00 AM (view original):
I use FSS. **** those camps. Waste of cash.
Its not a waste I think public camps are a waste and FSS is a useless tool.
Maybe you just put your finger on your problem, ward.

BTW, for the guy who said, "The prestige level of the school in D3 and D2 no longer really makes much difference since the recruits are no longer tiered by prestige during recruiting" if you're suggesting prestige doesn't affect D2 and D3 recruiting, that's incorrect. Prestige is actually pretty significant at those levels.
2/11/2017 5:31 PM (edited)
Posted by CoachSpud on 2/11/2017 5:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by CoachWard95 on 2/11/2017 12:16:00 PM (view original):
Posted by kashmir75 on 2/11/2017 8:47:00 AM (view original):
I use FSS. **** those camps. Waste of cash.
Its not a waste I think public camps are a waste and FSS is a useless tool.
Maybe you just put your finger on your problem, ward.

BTW, for the guy who said, "The prestige level of the school in D3 and D2 no longer really makes much difference since the recruits are no longer tiered by prestige during recruiting" if you're suggesting prestige doesn't affect D2 and D3 recruiting, that's incorrect. Prestige is actually pretty significant at those levels.
It matters less in recruiting battles than it once did, but it does still matter there. It no longer affects WHAT recruits you can aspire to recruit. That is pretty significant in itself.
2/11/2017 5:43 PM
Okay, I'll agree with you, a D3 or D2 coach can still aspire, and "it does still matter there" [recruiting battles].
2/11/2017 5:47 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by Benis on 2/11/2017 5:48:00 PM (view original):
He's not getting it Kashmir. He didn't really play 2.0
Yeah. That's become evident.

Honestly, Presige is now almost exclusively a D1 issue. Not entirely, but largely. At D3, there really isn't a difinitive player any longer who makes or breaks my team so that I MUST battle for him. There are players worth battling for, no disputing that, but it isn't the same level of loss if I lose a battle for one. More to the point, is that there are plenty of untouched D1 players who I don't have to battle anyone for, and the talent level quite frankly, isn't as great a disparity as it is between the top tier D1 talent and the next level down. At D1, I believe you HAVE to battle for the best recruits if you want to make deep runs in the Post-Season. I just don't feel the same urgency at the lower levels.
2/11/2017 6:10 PM
LOL, you guys crack me up.
2/11/2017 6:27 PM
◂ Prev 123
Camps - Hosted, Public - or No Camps Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.