Quote: Originally Posted By iain on 8/28/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zbrent716 on 8/28/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By Skid22 on 8/28/2009
We got our projected ratings this AM and I can see how deep the abyss I have to climb out of really is. I have 28 players on my ML roster. 14 position players and 14 pitchers. 2 of the pitchers do not belong on a roster of any kind with control ratings of 30. They will be waived. I have 14 players arbitration eligible, 8 pitchers and 6 position guys. If I had my way I would probably cut 12 of them, but that is not a realistic option here. I have to field a team. I will arbitrate with 4 position players, 2 of which are deserving, and 4 pitchers, none of which I really want on the team, but there are almost 1500 innings that have to be pitched. The remaining 6 players will be released.
This leaves me with 20 major leaguers. Unfortunately the AAA roster is in worse shape than the majors and there is nobody marginally worthy of a promotion. Things get somewhat brighter the lower I go in the minors. I will have a good AA team with a couple of potential ML all star pitchers anchoring the staff.
One thing I do have is alot of $$$$$$$. After arbitration I should have in the vicinity of $40M to spend. If there are free agents that are young enough to be factors when I begin to contend, I will be a player. I will not overspend for players in their 30s. I need 5 more major leaguers so they will come from somewhere.With the depth of the league, I will probably be able to pick up some useful players in the rule V draft. There are only 4 teams that have a higher IFA budget than I do, so I should be a player when it comes to those players also.
Certainly with the 5 open ML slots, and perhaps even with the 4 arb-eligible but not really worthy guys, I might consider going really heavy in the Rule 5 draft. I'd imagine you have a decent draft position (since it's a bad team you are taking over), so you might be able to get a subpar (but serviable) SP prospect from a contending team who has no spot for him with that first pick.
Either way, that's almost free (only $50k to former team) talent that you can pick up for the league minimum that can help you (somewhat) immediately and is usually young enough to stick around for at least a couple seasons.
This could be a really useful idea, but I'd check past drafts before settling on that plan.
Some worlds only offer 2-3 even borderline MLers in each draft, and you don't want to be holding the bag.
Of course, how far wrong can you go for the ML minimum??
Agree, you may not get too many quality guys, but like you said, how bad can the hit be for the league minimum. Especially if you can replace the sub-par arbitration eligible guys with sub-par league minimum Rule 5 guys. Could easily shave a couple million off of payroll without sacrificing any ML productivity.
It also may depend on what you consider "even borderline" MLers... there almost always seems to be a no-hitting high PC catcher, a crappy splits/high power 1B, or (if you're lucky) a .200 hitting SS available. Role players at best on a contending team, but for a rebuild they might get PT and continue to develop.