Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 1/31/2010
1. It's equally retarded because, rather than a half dozen or so owners trying to "fix" a world(ala Foxx), you're putting the responsibility into one man's hands. How many worlds have moronic commishes?
2. Yes, they are. And, rather than allow my world to admit n00bs, I'd create an alias to keep my world for falling beneath your requirements. Then, when I found more owners, I'd withdraw my alias. My world would have full knowledge of what I'm doing. Of course, some commishes would simply let their alias play.
3. I access WifS from 3 computers. I have three email addresses(and can obvously create as many as I want). So, right now, I could put three teams in one world and no one would know. End of story.
1) Besides yours? (couldn't resist) One person, receiving reimbursement, with power to remove owners, and who will be removed if not doing his job will likely be more effective than a dozen "rescuers"
2) Fill the league in 7 days and you don't have to consider newbies - use an alias yourself and FUBAR the league wifs removes you from the position and the league - awful damn short sighted, you might do it but most would not
3) you would need multiple computers, multiple emails and multiple payment systems under different names - did not say it couldn't be done but wifs should pick up all but the most sophisticated - plus the commish would have the power to boot you and the alias at the next rollover if you FUBARed the league. If you just ran it as 2 seperate legit teams then wifs and the other league members won't care.
The key is motivated - replaceable commissioners - there is no doubt this would require some work on wifs part - but they have a broken business model and they should try something new
Since they are even less likely to try your supposed solution and the "rescuers" approach is total nonsense as an earlier post of yours admitted Let's hear your WORKABLE solution.