oldave, i think you are pretty close in your assessment. i would really go off loudness, not head count, in the %ages, and i think the cornell fans were great, the kentucky fans were great, and many of those others just weren't very vocal in the UK/cornell game. it was obvious though that the second game was "The Game", from how quiet the first was.
i thought the down time was pretty interesting. it alternates which team's cheerleaders and band plays. every time kentucky had the time, they did a super-recognizable thing (to UK fans) and got most of the UK fans involved. in cornell's time, 90% of the time it was really quiet and they were seemingly ignored (not a knock, just an observation). even though it had nothing to do with the game, i thought it pretty accurately summarized the whole situation. also, i am kind of curious what cornell does at home games. do the cheerleaders just go out and do their own thing, or do they get the crowd into it? seems if they had things to get the crowd into it, we would have seem them. i think the big red need to get on some fan centric cheers, it seems to go a pretty long way, keeping your fans engaged and excited in the dead ball periods.
on the tickets thing, i don't know how that all works. but i think each school usually only gets 500 or something. the rest are dished out somehow before hand. i bought my tickets long before seedings even came out on stubhub, there were tons of tickets there and on ebay (well above face value, but what can you do). anyway, if you are in section 107, start a "GO SUNY Oneonta" chant and i will stop by and say hello ;)
and yeah, there are definitely some overly cocky cat fans. i think it comes with the territory (of being a top program in anything). i grew up in Yankees country, and let me tell you... it can be much worse :)