Posted by emy1013 on 4/18/2012 2:44:00 PM (view original):
One thing I would think would be interesting is to have a cap/potential on IQ as well as ratings.  Ratings no longer increase at a linear rate, so why should IQ?  We've all seen kids who pick up the O and D very quickly (think coaches sons) and we've all seen those kids that are dumber than a bucket of hair and never quite "get it".  To think that all kids would learn offensive and defensive sets at the same rate is about as unrealistic as anything in this game.  

They don't.  Recruit someone with a 1 WE and you'll see.

how bout they add stealing to a attribute.(i mean even though it might be included in defense i still want to know how they good they are more specificly.)

another thing is like a bracket challenge for your division kind of like WIS sports betting but just for the brackets.

Posted by phillyboy108 on 4/18/2012 3:12:00 PM (view original):
another thing is like a bracket challenge for your division kind of like WIS sports betting but just for the brackets.

+1

Posted by phillyboy108 on 4/18/2012 3:12:00 PM (view original):
another thing is like a bracket challenge for your division kind of like WIS sports betting but just for the brackets.

+1

Posted by reinsel on 4/18/2012 2:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by emy1013 on 4/18/2012 2:44:00 PM (view original):
One thing I would think would be interesting is to have a cap/potential on IQ as well as ratings.  Ratings no longer increase at a linear rate, so why should IQ?  We've all seen kids who pick up the O and D very quickly (think coaches sons) and we've all seen those kids that are dumber than a bucket of hair and never quite "get it".  To think that all kids would learn offensive and defensive sets at the same rate is about as unrealistic as anything in this game.  

They don't.  Recruit someone with a 1 WE and you'll see.

Maybe that's why I never noticed, I tend to "avoid" those 1 WE guys!

Posted by emy1013 on 4/18/2012 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by reinsel on 4/18/2012 2:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by emy1013 on 4/18/2012 2:44:00 PM (view original):
One thing I would think would be interesting is to have a cap/potential on IQ as well as ratings.  Ratings no longer increase at a linear rate, so why should IQ?  We've all seen kids who pick up the O and D very quickly (think coaches sons) and we've all seen those kids that are dumber than a bucket of hair and never quite "get it".  To think that all kids would learn offensive and defensive sets at the same rate is about as unrealistic as anything in this game.  

They don't.  Recruit someone with a 1 WE and you'll see.

Maybe that's why I never noticed, I tend to "avoid" those 1 WE guys!

ZIIIIIIIIIING!!!

I think that rankings should be updated. My Colby-Sawyer team has the #9 RPI and #6 SOS and only just broke into the top 25 today (after beating a very good defiance team). Before that, we were not even ranked, with the #12 RPI and #10 SOS. Now, we just barely round out the top 25.

Bottom line, a team that has those lines should be ranked higher than teams with 24 RPI and 145 SOS or 39 RPI and 130 SOS or, heck, the number 9 team (coached by a very good coach brianxavier) who has the same record as me and only #19 RPI and #28 SOS. No offense meant to any of these coaches, but I feel like Colby-Sawyer should be ranked higher than this.

Sorry to bust everyone's bubble but Seble never reads our suggestions! Then he would actually have to work on HD.

agreed williow lol

Still, these discussions are healthy for the game. 

healthy for venting............but not for the improvemnt of the game. Until Seble listens to the "paying customers" we can dream of things that would make this game even better, but thats all they will ever be, just dreams. Listen to your paying customers, the ones that help keep you emplyed and pay your salaries.