Look, that's the heart of this strategy. He gets top value for his deals not because he's special, but because he's dealing away top players. They may be past their best-before date - and he certainly knows so - but they're likely still better than any other available players. The discipline of the owner is to never pay too much, never hold on too long because he has no favorites.
He gets players he can't get in the draft through trade.
His roster never gets old or overpriced, stays cheap, so he can transfer max to chase IFA.
Because his players are the best, he doesn't budget for coaching or medical, so he can transfer more to IFA.
Because he's never drafting early, he doesn't spend on scouting, saving more for IFA.
He always gets the best IFAs. His roster is probably 45% IFAs, 45% acquired in trade, maybe two or three positions with players he drafted to play specific roles, like C, DH, or defensive SS.
When he trades players away, he's trading away former first rounders or high-dollar IFAs. Probably with some all star seasons on their player cards. Other owners snap up these proven commodities.
The system feeds itself over and over. He always has the best players without ever having to rebuild.
As MikeT said, the only thing any other owner can do to stop this system is to refuse to trade with him. IMO this system doesn't work if no one ever trades with him, and forces his roster to age out.
4/29/2015 1:31 PM (edited)