Gingrich's "Food Stamp" Comment Topic

Posted by antonsirius on 5/30/2011 8:31:00 PM (view original):
You ignore it every time I say it. Why do you think you deserve any more consideration than you give me?
because I can back it up. You never can.
5/31/2011 3:53 AM
No, you can't. It's one of your more frequent lies.
5/31/2011 8:19 AM
Posted by antonsirius on 5/31/2011 8:19:00 AM (view original):
No, you can't. It's one of your more frequent lies.
I dont think it is.

Wipe away all the insults and what I actually see you as is an isolated elitist.

You never seem to understand how obscure some of your beliefs are.

I have minority beliefs. I support the legalization of prostitution, I support gay marriage and I am an Atheist. In each case I know I am in the minority on these views.

You always seem to be clueless as to the fact that your views are not only minority, but a pretty tiny minority.
5/31/2011 2:14 PM
The fact that you care whether one other person anywhere shares either of our  beliefs on anything is a big reason why you lose every single ******* argument you have on this site or any other venue.

I speak for myself, and myself alone.

You speak for yourself, and yourself alone.

Until you understand that basic fact, you will never be anything more than a pathetic joke.
6/1/2011 2:45 AM
You two should get a room.    And two guns. 
6/1/2011 10:47 AM
Posted by antonsirius on 6/1/2011 2:45:00 AM (view original):
The fact that you care whether one other person anywhere shares either of our  beliefs on anything is a big reason why you lose every single ******* argument you have on this site or any other venue.

I speak for myself, and myself alone.

You speak for yourself, and yourself alone.

Until you understand that basic fact, you will never be anything more than a pathetic joke.
And I accept that people will disagree with me. You do not.

And you insist on launching personal attacks against me.

So if this is just a group of guys talking lets make a vow to drop personal attacks.

It is ok to question our motives in  a political light, but no more personal attacks.

Are you up to the challenge???
6/1/2011 1:05 PM
Here's a pic of a challenge I'd like you two to take part in:

6/1/2011 3:45 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 6/1/2011 1:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by antonsirius on 6/1/2011 2:45:00 AM (view original):
The fact that you care whether one other person anywhere shares either of our  beliefs on anything is a big reason why you lose every single ******* argument you have on this site or any other venue.

I speak for myself, and myself alone.

You speak for yourself, and yourself alone.

Until you understand that basic fact, you will never be anything more than a pathetic joke.
And I accept that people will disagree with me. You do not.

And you insist on launching personal attacks against me.

So if this is just a group of guys talking lets make a vow to drop personal attacks.

It is ok to question our motives in  a political light, but no more personal attacks.

Are you up to the challenge???
More blatant lies disproven by basically every thread in this forum. I disagree with other people all the time, and respect their viewpoints. I just have zero respect for you and yours.

You are not an exemplar of my interactions with other people. Again, you think you represent something bigger than yourself. You are wrong.

You're alone, swamp. Completely and utterly alone.

As for the personal attacks, when you lie to me constantly, you are launching a personal attack against me -- the greatest possible personal attack on a forum like this, in fact. I merely respond in kind.

So I'll vow to stop the name-calling when you vow to stop lying. I'm not holding my breath.
6/1/2011 10:14 PM
I knew you couldnt do this. You need to attack  me. You cannot discuss issues with me. You cannot say I am wrong because of these 2 facts on this issue.

You need your fallback. And I have proven time and again that you were wrong in calling me a liar and you never once proved I lied.

And then you kept looking until you found a source that says that a person who made a mistake is the same as conciously not telling the truth.

I just wanted to let the world see that I wanted to make this about the issues and you always want to maintain our personal feud. I wanted to let people see how low you are.
6/2/2011 7:44 PM
1 Discussing issues with you is like discussing issues with a bumper sticker collection. I tried it, it was completely futile, I gave up.

2 Now you're lying about proving me wrong about your lying. Three more spins 'round that drain and you'll disappear up your own ***. Be careful.

3 If by "kept looking for a source" you mean "linked to the first dictionary definition I found on a Google search", sure. Or I could just call that another lie. By the way, attacking me for linking to a definition when you can't even manage that simple task when you post your own incorrect definitions of words is very, very choice.

4 Please keep letting "the world" (by which you mean this tiny little corner of the internet, you utter moron) know all about what a horrible person I am. It does my reputation no end of good.
6/3/2011 11:43 AM
1 This has always been a lie. I support issues all across the spectrum. I am mostly a conservative but also support libertarian issue (legalize drugs and prostitution) and liberal issue (pro-choice and support gay marriage). The reson people print Bumper Stickers is because they have popular phrases on them. I realize that is foreign to you.

2 I am willing to have the lying discussion anytime you want. Lying is a concious act. You cannot lie by accident. The fact that you found a source that said it is irelevant.

3 There are always multiple definitions in a dictionary. Some are not popular. I say if you stop 100 people in a mall and ask who is right about this you lose like I am Johnson and you are Goldwater in 64.

4 I always get sitemail when I put you in your place. My fame based on showing you up is what I am here for.

6/3/2011 12:53 PM
That is the great thing about site mail, no one can prove that you did not get it.
6/3/2011 2:46 PM
1 No, it isn't a lie. The fact that you know history is your enemy -- particularly your history on this site -- is no reason for the rest of us to forget the past.

I've been having conversations with you for, what, six years now? We first crossed paths when you were pushing for carryover to be slashed in GD, and even back then you were lying about your "silent majority" of GD users who supported you wholeheartedly but were too timid to post in the forums to defend your position (you know, the exact same lie you just recycled with your "I get sitemails!" bullshit).

Back then you were purely a sideshow to the snake_p masterclass in trolling, but I still remember those threads. I even semi-complimented, semi-mocked your stubbornness and refusal to ever give ground on any point ever by posting a giant picture of a Weeble and saying it was actually a picture of you.

When the conversation moved to politics, in the run-up to Bush-Kerry, I went months treating you exactly the same as I treated every other user I've ever talked to on this site. You kept lying, and kept spinning and kept bullshitting, and my treatment of you changed right along with that stream of **** you directed my way (and everybody's way, but they're responsible for their own reactions). This would have been about the time you admitting that Karl Rove was your hero, and that you modeled your debate tactics after his political tactics, which says it all really.

We're at the place we are now because you have lied to me constantly and consistently for six years, swamp. Six ******* years. That's how deep the hole you've dug for yourself is.

I don't give a **** what positions you take on any issue. I care whether you are honest in expressing them and defending them.

You are not. Never have been, and at this point I have to assume you never will be. When I have fun with obscenities and rip you multiple new ********, that's what it's borne out of. Six ******* years of lies.

So go hide behind your silent majority. Hide behind your phantom sitemails, your 100 hypothetical people in a hypothetical mall that perfectly reflect the imaginary reality in your head. Draw what strength you can from shadows and lies, because you are terrified of being alone and standing on your own two feet.

I know it's all you have.
6/3/2011 4:38 PM
swamp can't see reality through the hypothetical water cooler on his head.
6/3/2011 4:50 PM
goodness - it is nice to know that some things never change . . . . . .
6/4/2011 1:38 PM
◂ Prev 1...7|8|9|10 Next ▸
Gingrich's "Food Stamp" Comment Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.