Ok I need some advice here on how to handle a depth chart situation.The pg shown is normally at my sg position and plays well despite his poor bh and pass. The SF plays at the SF. The opponent I have coming up has fairly weaker scorers at the guard spots (or at the very least not used as much), but his SF is his major scoring threat. I was considering moving the pg to the SF for this game and the SF to the SG because of the difference in Ath/ Spd/ Def. Would this be a good or bad idea? My concern might be the lack of speed on the SF being  a negative.

Pos.	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	FT	TOT

PG

84

82

30

89

17

63

4

37

34

77

84

62

B+

663

SF

35

56

25

42

44

81

63

48

41

70

88

80

B-

673

Thanks in advance for constructive advice.

seems like a pretty genius idea to me. btw the only reason your pg probably does well is because of his ridiculous athleticism and speed ;) 

I am a Press coach (3 teams). If I were looking at these 2 without knowing what their listed positons were, your PG would be my SF all the tiime andyour SF would ne my SG. Just my observation. GL.

I figured early that his ath/ spd was what made him great. I usually play him at sg because he tends to draw a lot of fouls from opponents sg. I've come to see a lot of teams lead scorer is their guard and they often get into foul try trouble. Thanks for the feedback, I was just concerned that there may be a negative effect to the SF having less speed at sg.

as far as the defense i play is M2M