OK - I went back and looked and here are two examples.
1. In my first year at Mercer, I had one open scholarship and a D- prestige, and managed to cut 4 players and get 5 new players with the money from one scholarship.
The year before I took over they were 8-19. My first year, they were 9-19, the next year 20-7, then in the 3rd year they were 27-4 and had a C+ prestige. I then moved to St. Louis, where I repeated the procedure.
2. In my first year at St. Louis, I had 2 scholarships with a D+ prestige, and cut 6 players, so I ended up with 8 new players.
I think that these were both in Knight. The year before I took over they were 6-21. My first year, they went 6-21, then 12-16. The third year, they were 24-5, and by year 4, they were 28-3., and the prestige went up to a "B" In the first year, when I cut the 6 players, the team rating that I ended up with after recruiting was better than the rating I started with before recruiting. In other words, the freshmen and a couple of transfers that I brought in actually improved the team before the season even started.
In both cases I focused on getting players with tons of potential. I also replaced players who were really not good at all.
However - a word of warning - do not cut players before recruiting starts. I was in a conference one time, and a new coach came in and cut a player before recruiting, and his best player decided to leave because he had cut his "HOMEY". I don't think that this would happen in cuts made after recruiting starts.
7/15/2013 9:31 PM (edited)