I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

I have a guy that is basically exactly at those numbers.

www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Stats.aspx

I wouldn't say really good but solid. I think the speed is what makes a difference. If it was 85 I would definitely say really good maybe elite. I have a guy who just graduated from my Lock Haven team last year who was 6th all time in assists with 493. He was about 75/75 ball handing and passing but 95 speed and 60 ath.

My PG for that team is actually pretty close to your numbers too.

www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Stats.aspx

Thanks!

I like my PGs to have better passing, and like blackdog said 10 more points of speed would be great, but I'd start him if I had too and not be too concerned about it. (ignoring def and off...)

Posted by Trentonjoe on 1/27/2014 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

Good. Close to really good.

I agree that speed seals the deal. Had a D2 kid who just finished up with 100/72/73. The speed made him exceptional. 6-1 A/T.

I also screen for over 50 ATH for point guards at D2. It seems many people try to get by with high speed and low athleticism; athleticism helps a great deal.

GL with your new PG.

Posted by Trentonjoe on 1/27/2014 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

I just completed a ten year run at Post in Rupp with 6 title game appearances, 3 of those wins, and I didn't have a PG who could match those 3 ratings for that whole time.  75/95/75 at D2 is really good and Joe, you've been playing long enough that you shouldn't have to ask, especially since you're always telling the newer coaches what benchmarks to aim for anyway.

Posted by emy1013 on 1/28/2014 2:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 1/27/2014 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

I just completed a ten year run at Post in Rupp with 6 title game appearances, 3 of those wins, and I didn't have a PG who could match those 3 ratings for that whole time.  75/95/75 at D2 is really good and Joe, you've been playing long enough that you shouldn't have to ask, especially since you're always telling the newer coaches what benchmarks to aim for anyway.

I think all new D2 TJ threads are attempts to lure colonels into discussion on anything, possibly just on the theory that let trevor talk long enough he's bound to **** off someone - which I support btw - game on gentlemen.

Posted by dacj501 on 1/28/2014 3:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by emy1013 on 1/28/2014 2:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 1/27/2014 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

I just completed a ten year run at Post in Rupp with 6 title game appearances, 3 of those wins, and I didn't have a PG who could match those 3 ratings for that whole time.  75/95/75 at D2 is really good and Joe, you've been playing long enough that you shouldn't have to ask, especially since you're always telling the newer coaches what benchmarks to aim for anyway.

I think all new D2 TJ threads are attempts to lure colonels into discussion on anything, possibly just on the theory that let trevor talk long enough he's bound to **** off someone - which I support btw - game on gentlemen.

I think you're probably right.  Good call. 

I am not that clever.

Posted by dacj501 on 1/28/2014 3:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by emy1013 on 1/28/2014 2:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Trentonjoe on 1/27/2014 6:54:00 PM (view original):
I am not worried about defense or scoring. Is a 75/95/75, spd/bh/pass, really good?

I just completed a ten year run at Post in Rupp with 6 title game appearances, 3 of those wins, and I didn't have a PG who could match those 3 ratings for that whole time.  75/95/75 at D2 is really good and Joe, you've been playing long enough that you shouldn't have to ask, especially since you're always telling the newer coaches what benchmarks to aim for anyway.

I think all new D2 TJ threads are attempts to lure colonels into discussion on anything, possibly just on the theory that let trevor talk long enough he's bound to **** off someone - which I support btw - game on gentlemen.

Many of my threads are an attempt to lure people into a discussion about how the game works.   My problems is I sometimes don't ask the right questions.   I guess what I am really thinking about it how important is speed in relation to ball handling and passing for a pure point guard.   I think I am currently under valuing it and was looking for other opinions.

I think you are arriving at a belief I share -- crazy high speed can let a guard with ball-handling and passing in the 60's - 70's play point exceptionally well without crazy high dribbling and passing ability. Your new PG -- his starting athleticism in the 60's will help too.