I know you can get away with sub 50 ath for guards at D2 if you have 70+ spd and 50+ def but haven't played D2 to know.

I assume anything under 50 is bad at any position and would probably need 80+ spd if lets say 40ish ath?  Could a 40 ath start or is it to big a difference to make up for?

40 ath if the other cores are very good to great can work as long as its not every player...

how is he being utilized? starter, defender, scorer off the bench - pg, sg or sf? i have a pg that has 39/78/42 ath/sp/def, and 71/64/72 per/bh/pass - and he's been a consistent scorer off the bench. i play him at sg/sf, and he hasn't been a liability.

http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerHistory/RatingsHistory.aspx?tid=14118&pid=2858940

I really liked this player in my 3-2 zone. He had a block of 83 which was allright. He did get doubleteamed, and had some big games. I think he made the team I had a lot better. But maybe I am wrong. Check his DEF, check his ATH... Not something you jump to. I knew he was high-high in both REB and LP, so I Grabbed him.

http://www.whatifsports.com/hd/PlayerProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=0&pid=2934347

Right now I have this player, he is the core of my defense, my frontline is weak... But with his SB, he helps the def. His stats at ATH and DEF are higher, he has better SB, but I'd take Morse over him anytime. I know what impact he had. I was a lot tougher to defend when I had Morse.

I'll go into the 20's or 30's for a high octane scorer.   I generally play those guys off the bench but a 90/90 PER/SPD  30/30 ATH/DEF guy still has value.