while i understand that the repricing based on utilization is an iterative process, has anyone looked at the net effects of the repricing of players, i still see alot of cookies in the stat snapshot. i understand that even in a perfect market, there will be a "best value" player, but from the weekly stat snapshots i've seen, it doesnt look like the re-pricing has discouraged teams from picking HJohnson, AJoss, MDilone, etc. perhaps the feedback loop is significantly longer than expected?