I have two guys, one will play at SF and one at PF:

Carlos Young

Projected Ratings:
Ath: 74
Sp; 52
Re: 69
De: 98
SB: 88
LP: 72
Pe: 31
BH: 46
Pa: 28
ST: 73


Robert Streeter

Projected Ratings:
Ath: 88
SP: 51
Reb: 83
De: 98
SB: 45
LP: 95
Pe: 9
BH: 72
Pa: 48
St: 89

I assume you play motion and man? If so, Id personally play yYung at SF and Streeter at PF. Streeter just has too low of a PE to play at a wing slot for my style.

It depends on how your offense flows. Im able to play a SF at PF and I've even started him at Center to create a mismatch. Although i could play him at all 5 positions just fine depending on the match ups.

What's the question? And whats the defense/offense?

Posted by Trentonjoe on 2/2/2017 12:35:00 PM (view original):
What's the question? And whats the defense/offense?

Sorry. I wrote it super quick and didn't have time to edit. My fault TJ. O/D is motion/man. Who should play at SF, Streeter or Young is the question. I really don't know at all. It may be important that the C and backup C should be BOSS rebounders (Starter: Projected 93 Reb and 98 Ath Backup Projected 100 Reb and 81 Ath) so Young's low REB at PF may no be damning.

I love the ability for Streeter to have great BH and so-so with the ability to SCHOOL some of the 60 SP and 15 RE young guys stick at SF. Usually, the PF spot is much better defended I feel.

To me I see the BH/pass and it seems to me that the obvious 3 is streeter. But that's only thinking like what I would see in real life and what I would want in real life. HD I'm assuming wouldn't recognize what I would from a 3

Streeter is a solid 3 IMO. He's a legit scoring option and his guard skills (SPD/BH/PASS) are solid enough as long as you aren't playing top 10 teams. He be hurt by 90/90 SPD/PER guys so if you're playing one of them, maybe you move him to the 4. I wouldn't play him at the 4 against a team with a solid scoring threat there because of his block. He'll handle a 70/70 guy okay but a 90/90 guy is a problem.

Young is a backup. Guys like that don't get a ton of minutes on good teams. I know you're rebuilding and he may be the best you have but he doesn't brink much to the table. He's a good defender at the 4 but a - rebounder and isn't going to score unless he's playing a sim. He's a backup 4 on a NT quality team IMO. Something like a 5th big.

I agree about Young. I got 4 great players and I just wanted a guy who really wouldn't hurt me on DE. Do you like this guy more?

Richard Robbins:

Projected Ratings:
Ath: 83
SP: 21
Reb: 98
De: 80
SB: 78
LP: 63
Pe: 1
BH: 33
Pa: 25
St: 67 (BLAAAARG)

You probably don't like him at all nevertheless better then Young. He was the last ditch **** guy from a second period where I NEEDED 3 guys. I got so freaking close to getting this inel stud. Then Kansas popped in and I hear that A+ usually beats D-.

I like Robbins more than young. He can rebound and play defense. Robbins can only really play d. Plus, I would not have an issue playing Robbins at the 4 or 5 but Young's low rebound makes him a bad 5.

Cool. Thanks for the input TJ. That's super helpful.