I took over a job, granted it was A- Colorado, and think I did a really nice job for a second session. I have done terribly in the past. I NEEDED to sign 3 guys, or simmy would recruit a freshmen for me, which I would have later had to rescind. Can we make this a thread where people share their classes at session 2 DI?

Tribble:
ATH 89
SP 33
REB 82+
DE 89
SB 76
LP 71+
PER 26
BH 59
PA 56+
WE 50
STAM 96+

Mines
ATH 95
SP 60+
REB 67
DE 100
SB 68
LP 65
PER 63
BH 47
PA 33
WE 50
STA 81

Not Signed Yet (Will sign unless sim goes crazy)
ATH 57
SP 78
DE 56
LP 38+
PER 90
BH 91
PA 80
WE 55
STA 97+

They all have a Green Free Throw too. First two guys look pretty nice. Bottom guy isn't my type of players but he could be an 11th guy who plays 10 minutes and jacks threes.

Can you guys also give feedback on the players? Even if you think they suck.

Were those guys set up for you by the previous guy, or did you start from scratch? If set up for you, it was nice of him not to do a bunch of visits you would have lost credit for, and couldn’t have gotten back.

If from scratch, I’d say those guys are very good, and a bit above what new coaches can generally find in the second session.

What O/D?

As a a general rule, just compare them to what you came from? Would these guys have played/started/dominated on your Weber St. team?

Had nothing from a previous coach. 70-70 first two cycles on Tribble and Mines. 80 the third on the guard. Motion-Man.

These guys would have been nice backups on Weber, but of course I had 8 Top 70 players.

Well if they would have been backups on a S16 team they probably aren't starters on a S16 team. They are D1 players but not major contributors on a team looking to make a deep run in the NT.

Posted by Trentonjoe on 10/26/2017 4:11:00 PM (view original):
Well if they would have been backups on a S16 team they probably aren't starters on a S16 team. They are D1 players but not major contributors on a team looking to make a deep run in the NT.

Couldn't agree more. Thanks.