Tell me I'm wrong. In open leagues at 80 million when certain people "sell" their aaa for small amounts of cash or bad 200 to 500k players they are scamming the intention of the game. They are randomly giving some teams decent aaa for almost nothing. The trades are miles from fair. I saw a $2 million dollar aaa guy for a $277K player. My main point is, everyone is not a cheater. But if someone was trying to stack someone else's team, or his team under a different user name this is exactly how you'd do it. So like I've always seen and felt, just veto it. The problem is a lot of people don't care and say it's not their business. I say the veto process is exactly to make sure the trade is reasonably equal. It's to assure a fair league. It's to assure a balance in talent.
I've only seen a veto a few times over the years.
Any one else see vetos used often?
Veto to guarantee fairness or who cares?
3/1/2018 12:42 AM (edited)